Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls' Legends and Lore (or, "All Roads Lead to Rome, Redux")
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 5474909" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>I think you misunderstood me. (Which is not to say you'll agree with me even if you do understand me.)</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that people like the old games because of nostalgia. Heck, if I wanted to run or play in a non-4e D&D game I'd be tempted to go AD&D/OSRIC ahead of 3E.</p><p></p><p>But what puzzles me is why people care whether its WotC or someone else who's publishing the OSRIC rules, new OSRIC adventures, etc etc. Nostalgia seemed a possible explanation for <em>that</em>.</p><p></p><p>I was also suggesting that nostalgia might be a reason why people want to (re-)purchase Vault of the Drow, the Slave Lords etc. Raven Crowking has given an alternative reason - new copies to replace old worn out copies.</p><p></p><p>Because I've always been happy to prepare my own setting stuff, and/or to cobble together bits or pieces of whatever I've got on my shelf (D&D's pantheon meets Palladium's pantheon meet's 1st ed Deities & Demigods meets . . .), maybe I personally don't feel the force of this. Especially because quite a bit of this stuff is on my shelf (mostly but not always picked up second hand from my local game store). I can see how others might feel differently.</p><p></p><p>My own hypothesis is that WotC are sitting on their IP because they believe that by selling it, even if the proceeds of sale are greater than the cost of hosting and processing sales, they will dilute their brand and therefore ultimately cost themselves more sales. I don't know if this is true. If I read him correctly, I believe that DannyAlcatraz thinks it's false.</p><p></p><p>But WotC would hardly be the only company that sits on its IP. That's the way of things in a world in which cultural production is privatised. (My collection of Rolemaster materials is incomplete, for example, because some of my stuff was lent out and not returned, and other stuff I never got back in the day, and now you can't get it at all. This is just the way of the modern world, I think.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 5474909, member: 42582"] I think you misunderstood me. (Which is not to say you'll agree with me even if you do understand me.) I'm not saying that people like the old games because of nostalgia. Heck, if I wanted to run or play in a non-4e D&D game I'd be tempted to go AD&D/OSRIC ahead of 3E. But what puzzles me is why people care whether its WotC or someone else who's publishing the OSRIC rules, new OSRIC adventures, etc etc. Nostalgia seemed a possible explanation for [I]that[/I]. I was also suggesting that nostalgia might be a reason why people want to (re-)purchase Vault of the Drow, the Slave Lords etc. Raven Crowking has given an alternative reason - new copies to replace old worn out copies. Because I've always been happy to prepare my own setting stuff, and/or to cobble together bits or pieces of whatever I've got on my shelf (D&D's pantheon meets Palladium's pantheon meet's 1st ed Deities & Demigods meets . . .), maybe I personally don't feel the force of this. Especially because quite a bit of this stuff is on my shelf (mostly but not always picked up second hand from my local game store). I can see how others might feel differently. My own hypothesis is that WotC are sitting on their IP because they believe that by selling it, even if the proceeds of sale are greater than the cost of hosting and processing sales, they will dilute their brand and therefore ultimately cost themselves more sales. I don't know if this is true. If I read him correctly, I believe that DannyAlcatraz thinks it's false. But WotC would hardly be the only company that sits on its IP. That's the way of things in a world in which cultural production is privatised. (My collection of Rolemaster materials is incomplete, for example, because some of my stuff was lent out and not returned, and other stuff I never got back in the day, and now you can't get it at all. This is just the way of the modern world, I think.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls' Legends and Lore (or, "All Roads Lead to Rome, Redux")
Top