Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aberzanzorax" data-source="post: 5486093" data-attributes="member: 64209">I'll say this,&nbsp;This would be a MUCH more positive thread and WotC would have taken a big step forward if the article had been exactly the same, but at the end they had added:&nbsp;&quot;and that's why we're...&quot;&nbsp;1. resuming availability of pdfs.2. expanding the GSL3. announcing the return to Dungeon and Dragon in print, from PAIZO (still 4e)4. Releasing a small series of brand new prior edition material.5. any other action that actually supported the statement being made.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;EDIT: I hope someone at WotC reads this thread and it helps them to understand the viewpoint/perspective fans currently have of the company, as well as how the actions of the company in the past few years have shaped that viewpoint/perspective. Sadly, I suspect that their current M.O. interpreting fan viewpoints/perspectives is &quot;it's all nerd rage&quot; and &quot;we can't do anything right, someone will always be mad at us.&quot; &nbsp;Maybe someone would be....but, as said earlier, better behavior and PR wouldn't have a 26 page discussion involving more than just a single someone. What they've been doing has made several &quot;someones&quot; mad...and they could realy improve the numbers with some better PR and policy.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aberzanzorax, post: 5486093, member: 64209"] I'll say this, This would be a MUCH more positive thread and WotC would have taken a big step forward if the article had been exactly the same, but at the end they had added: "and that's why we're..." 1. resuming availability of pdfs. 2. expanding the GSL 3. announcing the return to Dungeon and Dragon in print, from PAIZO (still 4e) 4. Releasing a small series of brand new prior edition material. 5. [B]any other action that actually supported the statement being made[/B]. EDIT: I hope someone at WotC reads this thread and it helps them to understand the viewpoint/perspective fans currently have of the company, as well as how the actions of the company in the past few years have shaped that viewpoint/perspective. Sadly, I suspect that their current M.O. interpreting fan viewpoints/perspectives is "it's all nerd rage" and "we can't do anything right, someone will always be mad at us." Maybe someone would be....but, as said earlier, better behavior and PR wouldn't have a 26 page discussion involving more than just a single someone. What they've been doing has made several "someones" mad...and they could realy improve the numbers with some better PR and policy. [/QUOTE]

Verification