Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 5500827" data-attributes="member: 15538">I was not criticizing 4e's playability in my post. I simply made the observation that a 4e Skill Challenge has potential interest as a challenge in storytelling, but almost none as a challenge of statistical or tactical skill. You can't "win" a SC except through luck, or by successfully engaging the imaginary elements and figuring out what sort of resolution is appealing, particularly to the GM. That may very well be the best of all possible game designs, I can't say. But it is what it is.While I respect that you feel wronged in some respect, I can't discern how I have any ability to salve that wound. It is certainly not my intention to apply a double standard to any game system, or any group of players. Truthfully, I am much more interested in what I would consider points of intellectual worth, than in advancing any particular agenda. Games come and go. I don't know why you chose to use my post as a jumping-off point to complain about intellectual fairness. I thought the point was making was both minor and non-deragotory.</blockquote>