Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls Monster Makeover: Beholder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 3143214" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>I don't like it.</p><p></p><p>Firstly, I don't agree that facing is a big problem in the case of the Beholder, since it doesn't use shields, can move equally well in all directions, and is immune to flanking. So, while I can see the problems with flanking in the general case, I don't see why they're an issue here.</p><p></p><p>Secondly, while I generally dislike save-or-die effects, unless and until there's a new edition they are going to be a feature of high level games. And since the Beholder is a CR 13 creature, that places them amongst the high level foes. Therefore, I don't think an obsessive need to remove all such effects from the Beholder is warranted.</p><p></p><p>I also disagree with the assignment of Charm Monster (and perhaps Fear too) as a save-or-die effect. If the DM and players trust one another, I see no reason not to allow the player to continue to run his character while charmed. True, this will take monitoring by the DM, and perhaps an occasional (very occasional!) over-ruling of the player's choice of action, but I don't see why it shouldn't work. Also, I don't see how you can really run a successful high-level game without trust between DM and players.</p><p></p><p>However, there are some things I do agree with. The Beholder's anti-magic cone is a real pain. Likewise, the eye stalks do need some rethinking.</p><p></p><p>In fact, dealing with the anti-magic cone isn't perhaps as bad as is feared. Provided the DM has access to the character sheets, there is no reason he can't put together a set of stats for the character without magic. There are relatively few modifiers that can then apply to the characters at that point (rage, fatigue, a few others), which could be handled on the fly. Still, that requires the DM to do yet more prep work, and isn't a perfect solution in any case. I don't have a better solution, but I don't think Mearls' proposal is the way to go (from a 'it just feels wrong' perspective).</p><p></p><p>For the eye-stalks, I think the save DC is too low, especially if the Beholder also has to hit. I further think that Inflict Moderate Wounds should be replaced, probably with Inflict Serious or even Inflict Critical Wounds (it's not the flavour of the ability that's wrong - it's the damage done. So, increase it!). Charm Person is redundant if you have Charm Monster. And Finger of Death and Flesh to Stone should be replaced. In at least one case, I would go for Hold Monster, since although it does remove the PC from the game, it also allows a save each round, so isn't an all-or-nothing proposition (well, not quite). I'm not sure about the others - part of me wants to suggest Ray of Enfeeblement, but that's a spell that I've found particularly complex to apply on the fly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 3143214, member: 22424"] I don't like it. Firstly, I don't agree that facing is a big problem in the case of the Beholder, since it doesn't use shields, can move equally well in all directions, and is immune to flanking. So, while I can see the problems with flanking in the general case, I don't see why they're an issue here. Secondly, while I generally dislike save-or-die effects, unless and until there's a new edition they are going to be a feature of high level games. And since the Beholder is a CR 13 creature, that places them amongst the high level foes. Therefore, I don't think an obsessive need to remove all such effects from the Beholder is warranted. I also disagree with the assignment of Charm Monster (and perhaps Fear too) as a save-or-die effect. If the DM and players trust one another, I see no reason not to allow the player to continue to run his character while charmed. True, this will take monitoring by the DM, and perhaps an occasional (very occasional!) over-ruling of the player's choice of action, but I don't see why it shouldn't work. Also, I don't see how you can really run a successful high-level game without trust between DM and players. However, there are some things I do agree with. The Beholder's anti-magic cone is a real pain. Likewise, the eye stalks do need some rethinking. In fact, dealing with the anti-magic cone isn't perhaps as bad as is feared. Provided the DM has access to the character sheets, there is no reason he can't put together a set of stats for the character without magic. There are relatively few modifiers that can then apply to the characters at that point (rage, fatigue, a few others), which could be handled on the fly. Still, that requires the DM to do yet more prep work, and isn't a perfect solution in any case. I don't have a better solution, but I don't think Mearls' proposal is the way to go (from a 'it just feels wrong' perspective). For the eye-stalks, I think the save DC is too low, especially if the Beholder also has to hit. I further think that Inflict Moderate Wounds should be replaced, probably with Inflict Serious or even Inflict Critical Wounds (it's not the flavour of the ability that's wrong - it's the damage done. So, increase it!). Charm Person is redundant if you have Charm Monster. And Finger of Death and Flesh to Stone should be replaced. In at least one case, I would go for Hold Monster, since although it does remove the PC from the game, it also allows a save each round, so isn't an all-or-nothing proposition (well, not quite). I'm not sure about the others - part of me wants to suggest Ray of Enfeeblement, but that's a spell that I've found particularly complex to apply on the fly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls Monster Makeover: Beholder
Top