Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls Monster Makeover: Beholder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justin Bacon" data-source="post: 3144052" data-attributes="member: 3795"><p>Mearls is right that the rules for Eye Rays are unnecessarily complex. I've also never understood the "only X number of eye rays can be looking in one direction" rules -- those eyes are at the end of extendable stalks that can clearly point in any direction (except, possibly, directly below the beholder). </p><p></p><p>The way to model the eye rays is simple: The beholder can target any creature within range once per round.</p><p></p><p>If you want to limit the number of rays which can be turned on any given character simultaneously, just do it directly: "The beholder's eye rays interefere with each other, however. The beholder can only hit a single target with X number of rays in a single round."</p><p></p><p>The Antimagic Cone doesn't need any change at all. The beholder determines the direction the cone is facing as a free action on its turn and can turn the cone on or off as a free action. Changing the cone so that it doesn't interfere with the beholder's eye-stalks is a fundamental and completely unnecessary change to the beholder.</p><p></p><p>The only other problem with the beholder are the save-or-die effects. Personally, I don't like save-or-die effects at all, for exactly the reasons that Mearls talks about. But the solution there is not to change the beholder, it's to fix the save-or-die effects. (In my house rules, save-or-die effects cause 3d6 points of Constitution damage. Any special effects -- such as being reduced to a fine powdery dust or having your soul trapped in a gem -- only occur if the Con loss results in your death. If I was actually redesigning those effects wholesale, I'd have more powerful save-or-die spells deal more Con damage -- but this makes for a convenient, easy-to-remember, and easy-to-apply rule.)</p><p></p><p>(<em>Charm</em> and <em>fear</em>, however, are not save-or-die effects. You'll notice the complete lack of dying in those effects, Mike. <em>Flesh to stone</em> probably does qualify, since there's no way to recover without outside assistance if you fail the saving throw.)</p><p></p><p>And once you've fixed the save-or-die effects, you probably should crank up the save DCs like Mearls suggests.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justin Bacon, post: 3144052, member: 3795"] Mearls is right that the rules for Eye Rays are unnecessarily complex. I've also never understood the "only X number of eye rays can be looking in one direction" rules -- those eyes are at the end of extendable stalks that can clearly point in any direction (except, possibly, directly below the beholder). The way to model the eye rays is simple: The beholder can target any creature within range once per round. If you want to limit the number of rays which can be turned on any given character simultaneously, just do it directly: "The beholder's eye rays interefere with each other, however. The beholder can only hit a single target with X number of rays in a single round." The Antimagic Cone doesn't need any change at all. The beholder determines the direction the cone is facing as a free action on its turn and can turn the cone on or off as a free action. Changing the cone so that it doesn't interfere with the beholder's eye-stalks is a fundamental and completely unnecessary change to the beholder. The only other problem with the beholder are the save-or-die effects. Personally, I don't like save-or-die effects at all, for exactly the reasons that Mearls talks about. But the solution there is not to change the beholder, it's to fix the save-or-die effects. (In my house rules, save-or-die effects cause 3d6 points of Constitution damage. Any special effects -- such as being reduced to a fine powdery dust or having your soul trapped in a gem -- only occur if the Con loss results in your death. If I was actually redesigning those effects wholesale, I'd have more powerful save-or-die spells deal more Con damage -- but this makes for a convenient, easy-to-remember, and easy-to-apply rule.) ([i]Charm[/i] and [i]fear[/i], however, are not save-or-die effects. You'll notice the complete lack of dying in those effects, Mike. [i]Flesh to stone[/i] probably does qualify, since there's no way to recover without outside assistance if you fail the saving throw.) And once you've fixed the save-or-die effects, you probably should crank up the save DCs like Mearls suggests. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mearls Monster Makeover: Beholder
Top