Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Voadam" data-source="post: 3383789" data-attributes="member: 2209">I do.I would say C.The second statement is a bit of an inconsistent rant. He has a character playing a fighter with a background and he's complaining about the stat allocations. He complains about people appointing points for a &quot;build&quot; but then complains about players not appointing points to a social mechanics build. He ends by asking whatever happened to creating personalities as if assigning points to charisma equals creating a personality.IME the people wanting more roleplaying would say &quot;I've got a player whose fighter's background was as a mercenary captain. This gives me some hooks I can use in game for interactions. Old employees, employers, and adversaries are possible connections we can use in game then. I wonder why he's a former captain? Is he still motivated by greed, did things go bad and he needs a fresh start?&quot; etc.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Voadam, post: 3383789, member: 2209"] I do. I would say C. The second statement is a bit of an inconsistent rant. He has a character playing a fighter with a background and he's complaining about the stat allocations. He complains about people appointing points for a "build" but then complains about players not appointing points to a social mechanics build. He ends by asking whatever happened to creating personalities as if assigning points to charisma equals creating a personality. IME the people wanting more roleplaying would say "I've got a player whose fighter's background was as a mercenary captain. This gives me some hooks I can use in game for interactions. Old employees, employers, and adversaries are possible connections we can use in game then. I wonder why he's a former captain? Is he still motivated by greed, did things go bad and he needs a fresh start?" etc. [/QUOTE]

Verification