Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mearls on other settings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MechaPilot" data-source="post: 7160471" data-attributes="member: 82779"><p>I see people attempting to draw a "homebrew" vs "official product" distinction, but the arguments for that distinction are non-persuasive to me.</p><p></p><p>Litterally every D&D product or resource is homebrew in that's it's produced by fans of D&D, many of them having decades of experience with the game (Note: I will continue to use homebrew to refer to things made by non-publishers, because that's how I see it's typical usage). That some of those fans happen to work for WotC changes nothing. Mearls et al have, generally, made a quality product in 5e, but I would be remiss if I didn't point out that, in some cases, homebrew material is of a higher quality and is less prone to abuse than official material. When a player wants to use a new option at my table, I don't care if the entire staff of WotC held it aloft on a mountaintop and blessed it like Simba from the Lion King, I'm going to review it before allowing it because WotC is just as fallible as the next person. To their credit, I usually have no problem with upwards of 90% of the options they present.</p><p></p><p>This is equally true of settings. Whether a setting comes from WotC or someone else, what matters is that it's interesting, fun to play in, and has its own character and feel. There's literally no point to making a setting that's "FR, plus X, Y, & Z." They might as well just make an FR sourcebook or an FR article with X, Y, & Z in it and save the wasted time of making up a setting around them.</p><p></p><p>I have two homebrew settings of my own (Tenesia, and Wildwood). One day, I'd love to see them published. But, if I were given the choice of publishing Tenesia with the PHB races or keeping the races it has and not publishing it at all (or only publishing it in a free or pay-what-you-want PDF) I'd choose the latter every day of the week. The altered races are a huge part of Tenesia's identity in that they feed into the themes of the setting. The same is true with Wildwood and the changes in that setting.</p><p></p><p>And yes, I know WotC is trying to make money on their settings and I'm not (though I'd love it if I could). However, art (and writing is an art) requires some element of creating something different and taking a risk that some people might not like it. If you don't create something different, then the whole thing becomes a gray morass where innovation and original thought is subverted in the name of doing what's safe. That's how you get art that obeys all the tired old tropes and doesn't surprise you or make you think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MechaPilot, post: 7160471, member: 82779"] I see people attempting to draw a "homebrew" vs "official product" distinction, but the arguments for that distinction are non-persuasive to me. Litterally every D&D product or resource is homebrew in that's it's produced by fans of D&D, many of them having decades of experience with the game (Note: I will continue to use homebrew to refer to things made by non-publishers, because that's how I see it's typical usage). That some of those fans happen to work for WotC changes nothing. Mearls et al have, generally, made a quality product in 5e, but I would be remiss if I didn't point out that, in some cases, homebrew material is of a higher quality and is less prone to abuse than official material. When a player wants to use a new option at my table, I don't care if the entire staff of WotC held it aloft on a mountaintop and blessed it like Simba from the Lion King, I'm going to review it before allowing it because WotC is just as fallible as the next person. To their credit, I usually have no problem with upwards of 90% of the options they present. This is equally true of settings. Whether a setting comes from WotC or someone else, what matters is that it's interesting, fun to play in, and has its own character and feel. There's literally no point to making a setting that's "FR, plus X, Y, & Z." They might as well just make an FR sourcebook or an FR article with X, Y, & Z in it and save the wasted time of making up a setting around them. I have two homebrew settings of my own (Tenesia, and Wildwood). One day, I'd love to see them published. But, if I were given the choice of publishing Tenesia with the PHB races or keeping the races it has and not publishing it at all (or only publishing it in a free or pay-what-you-want PDF) I'd choose the latter every day of the week. The altered races are a huge part of Tenesia's identity in that they feed into the themes of the setting. The same is true with Wildwood and the changes in that setting. And yes, I know WotC is trying to make money on their settings and I'm not (though I'd love it if I could). However, art (and writing is an art) requires some element of creating something different and taking a risk that some people might not like it. If you don't create something different, then the whole thing becomes a gray morass where innovation and original thought is subverted in the name of doing what's safe. That's how you get art that obeys all the tired old tropes and doesn't surprise you or make you think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mearls on other settings
Top