Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zardnaar" data-source="post: 7172643" data-attributes="member: 6716779">I never said just because its new it doesn't belong. Any new stuff just has to fit the theme of a setting and generally the original should be the best source if there is a contradiction. Some of those setting do not want or need 38 archtypes IMHO and if you shoe horn things in you run the risk of ruining the setting or chasing off the fanbase (see 4E FR for a prime example).  Some things are borderline (requiring an Athasian sub class at the very least) other things should be out, other things the base class might need a slight tweak (5E Barbarians unarmored defense, 2E Barbarian was fine for DS). If every setting is the same generic sandbox wanna be why bother converting them, just make an environment book or magitech book or whatever. Whats going to make Krynn different from Greyhawk?</blockquote>