Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
Meet Our ‘Level Up’ Team!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OblivionDrive" data-source="post: 8075330" data-attributes="member: 7020101"><p>You expressed yourself fine. It feels more like a willful misreading of the thing to me.</p><p></p><p>You said "<em>So, when choosing a team with one of the goals being diversity, one has to be able to look past one's own assumptions and "soft" racism and <strong><em><u>not only</u></em></strong> look for who stands out as the best, but maybe who has great potential but hasn't had the best opportunities yet, or hasn't been recognized yet, or whose work has just the...something that you're looking for.</em>" The emphasis on those two words is what's being ignored.</p><p></p><p>The short version is basically, "If all other things are equal, going with a choice that makes your team's viewpoint more diverse is the way to go." It's not as if there's some etched-in-stone objective holy metric about quality of someone's work that you can judge one work vs another on. Nobody is putting Designer 1 and Designer 2's work on a scale and weighing it vs whatever the designerly version of the Feather of Ma'at is and casting the lesser one into the mouth of a waiting beast.</p><p></p><p>There will always be a degree of subjectivity in picking who you think is most qualified. And in those situations? If I have, say, ten positions I need filled and have 30 candidates who I feel are all around the same level of skill and quality? I'm gonna lean more heavily on making sure non-cishet white males are represented on my team. Does this mean no cishet white men will be hired? Of course not! But it's also not gonna mean that the team will be 90% white guys like it's historically been throughout tabletop's history. Because if we want to get to that mythical future meritocracy that some very vocal people always tout as the SOLE REASON ANYONE EVER SHOULD BE HIRED, you don't get to do that without getting experience under the belts of people who historically get ignored in favor of the entrenched old guard. That's how systemic change gets made - it starts as small moves on a local level and works its way up the chain.</p><p></p><p>TL;DR - your post was fine and I don't think most folks didn't get what you were saying.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OblivionDrive, post: 8075330, member: 7020101"] You expressed yourself fine. It feels more like a willful misreading of the thing to me. You said "[I]So, when choosing a team with one of the goals being diversity, one has to be able to look past one's own assumptions and "soft" racism and [B][I][U]not only[/U][/I][/B] look for who stands out as the best, but maybe who has great potential but hasn't had the best opportunities yet, or hasn't been recognized yet, or whose work has just the...something that you're looking for.[/I]" The emphasis on those two words is what's being ignored. The short version is basically, "If all other things are equal, going with a choice that makes your team's viewpoint more diverse is the way to go." It's not as if there's some etched-in-stone objective holy metric about quality of someone's work that you can judge one work vs another on. Nobody is putting Designer 1 and Designer 2's work on a scale and weighing it vs whatever the designerly version of the Feather of Ma'at is and casting the lesser one into the mouth of a waiting beast. There will always be a degree of subjectivity in picking who you think is most qualified. And in those situations? If I have, say, ten positions I need filled and have 30 candidates who I feel are all around the same level of skill and quality? I'm gonna lean more heavily on making sure non-cishet white males are represented on my team. Does this mean no cishet white men will be hired? Of course not! But it's also not gonna mean that the team will be 90% white guys like it's historically been throughout tabletop's history. Because if we want to get to that mythical future meritocracy that some very vocal people always tout as the SOLE REASON ANYONE EVER SHOULD BE HIRED, you don't get to do that without getting experience under the belts of people who historically get ignored in favor of the entrenched old guard. That's how systemic change gets made - it starts as small moves on a local level and works its way up the chain. TL;DR - your post was fine and I don't think most folks didn't get what you were saying. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
Meet Our ‘Level Up’ Team!
Top