Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Melee characters and Primary Attack Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alabast" data-source="post: 4729758" data-attributes="member: 61888"><p>Of the eight classes in the PHB 1, six of them have attack powers that make regular use of melee weapons (Cleric, Fighter, Paladin, Ranger, Rogue, Warlord). All except the rogue use STR at their primary stat for making melee attacks (Though the paladin, strangely, has some weapon attacks that use Charisma, and the distinction seems to be arbitrary). Since the rogue uses light weapons primarily, this makes sense, and consistency is established. Huzzah.</p><p></p><p>Since the release of the PHB, however, a number of new classes have come along that use melee weapon attacks, as well, namely Swordmage, Avenger, Barbarian, Bard and Warden. The Warden and Barbarian use STR to attack, like the others. The bard, swordmage, and avenger, however, use mental stats as their primary attack stat. I have no problem with this, since these classes are non-martial, except that they (the avenger in particular) seems inconsistent with the previous design philosophy. </p><p></p><p>I can easily imagine that an Avenger's wisdom score represents how we he channels his god's wrath, and thus affects his ability to strike his enemies. But how come a cleric, also a divine servant, needs to rely on his plain ol' physical strength to wallop enemies? Why not have all of the cleric's attacks use Wisdom, with STR helping out for little perk bonuses for melee attacks, as other classes do? Additionally, why are Paladins the only class that uses two different stats for melee attacks? Doesn't this automatically either a) diminish their ability scores by forcing a near-even split between two important stats or b) drastically reduce their choices for effective powers?</p><p></p><p>Does this seem like something that was intended from the start? Or was it a deliberate shift in game design philosophy to have every non-martial melee class have an primary attack stat be mental to reduce the importance of Strength and Dex that proliferated previous editions of D&D?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alabast, post: 4729758, member: 61888"] Of the eight classes in the PHB 1, six of them have attack powers that make regular use of melee weapons (Cleric, Fighter, Paladin, Ranger, Rogue, Warlord). All except the rogue use STR at their primary stat for making melee attacks (Though the paladin, strangely, has some weapon attacks that use Charisma, and the distinction seems to be arbitrary). Since the rogue uses light weapons primarily, this makes sense, and consistency is established. Huzzah. Since the release of the PHB, however, a number of new classes have come along that use melee weapon attacks, as well, namely Swordmage, Avenger, Barbarian, Bard and Warden. The Warden and Barbarian use STR to attack, like the others. The bard, swordmage, and avenger, however, use mental stats as their primary attack stat. I have no problem with this, since these classes are non-martial, except that they (the avenger in particular) seems inconsistent with the previous design philosophy. I can easily imagine that an Avenger's wisdom score represents how we he channels his god's wrath, and thus affects his ability to strike his enemies. But how come a cleric, also a divine servant, needs to rely on his plain ol' physical strength to wallop enemies? Why not have all of the cleric's attacks use Wisdom, with STR helping out for little perk bonuses for melee attacks, as other classes do? Additionally, why are Paladins the only class that uses two different stats for melee attacks? Doesn't this automatically either a) diminish their ability scores by forcing a near-even split between two important stats or b) drastically reduce their choices for effective powers? Does this seem like something that was intended from the start? Or was it a deliberate shift in game design philosophy to have every non-martial melee class have an primary attack stat be mental to reduce the importance of Strength and Dex that proliferated previous editions of D&D? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Melee characters and Primary Attack Stats
Top