Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Melf's Guide to Greyhawk: The Shield Lands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flying Toaster" data-source="post: 9883918" data-attributes="member: 7052563"><p>I was born right around the same time that the original white box went on sale to the general public, so obviously I never played 0E back in the day. In fact I did not even really know that it existed until I bought the Best of Dragon magazine compilations in the late 80s, and reading the first volume was quite a surprise. Even then it felt like a fascinating glimpse at a lost world, shrouded by the mists of time. </p><p></p><p>From what I can gather, the early Blackmoor and Greyhawk campaigns had a fairly serious tactical side inherited from the Chainmail war game, but this was combined with a wacky “anything goes” gonzo sensibility. Right from the beginning there were funhouse dungeons, crashed spaceships, vampire hunting, rules for gaining XP by carousing, and lots of crossovers with existing entertainment properties, including all of the Middle Earth content that got grandfathered in somehow. </p><p></p><p>So it has always seemed strange to me that some grognards are so adamant that an authentic Greyhawk can only feature a very particular version of the Tolkien races and nothing else. We also see this attitude among some of the OSR crowd, particularly those who explicitly reject new elements from the WotC era like dragonborn or tieflings. This singular devotion to D&D’s version of Tolkien, with the serial numbers filed off in some cases but not in others, seems particularly odd to me because Gary Gygax famously preferred gritty pulp subgenres like sword & planet or sword & sorcery to the high fantasy of LOTR. Perhaps Tolkien’s goblins and orcs became essential to old school D&D because they served as stand-ins for the bloodthirsty, barbaric villain races of so much Appendix N pulp, who existed mainly to get slaughtered by the mighty-thewed hero.</p><p></p><p>There have already been more than half a dozen major published versions of Greyhawk, and most people probably prefer whichever one they encountered first, just as most people prefer the music of their own youth to whatever the kids these days are into. My Greyhawk was the 1983 gold box set, but no doubt others prefer the 1980 folio, the 1988 hardcover, etc. I suspect that none of the published products closely resembles the original 1970s home game that Luke Gygax remembers, but that is OK. D&D settings should be whatever DMs and players want to make of them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flying Toaster, post: 9883918, member: 7052563"] I was born right around the same time that the original white box went on sale to the general public, so obviously I never played 0E back in the day. In fact I did not even really know that it existed until I bought the Best of Dragon magazine compilations in the late 80s, and reading the first volume was quite a surprise. Even then it felt like a fascinating glimpse at a lost world, shrouded by the mists of time. From what I can gather, the early Blackmoor and Greyhawk campaigns had a fairly serious tactical side inherited from the Chainmail war game, but this was combined with a wacky “anything goes” gonzo sensibility. Right from the beginning there were funhouse dungeons, crashed spaceships, vampire hunting, rules for gaining XP by carousing, and lots of crossovers with existing entertainment properties, including all of the Middle Earth content that got grandfathered in somehow. So it has always seemed strange to me that some grognards are so adamant that an authentic Greyhawk can only feature a very particular version of the Tolkien races and nothing else. We also see this attitude among some of the OSR crowd, particularly those who explicitly reject new elements from the WotC era like dragonborn or tieflings. This singular devotion to D&D’s version of Tolkien, with the serial numbers filed off in some cases but not in others, seems particularly odd to me because Gary Gygax famously preferred gritty pulp subgenres like sword & planet or sword & sorcery to the high fantasy of LOTR. Perhaps Tolkien’s goblins and orcs became essential to old school D&D because they served as stand-ins for the bloodthirsty, barbaric villain races of so much Appendix N pulp, who existed mainly to get slaughtered by the mighty-thewed hero. There have already been more than half a dozen major published versions of Greyhawk, and most people probably prefer whichever one they encountered first, just as most people prefer the music of their own youth to whatever the kids these days are into. My Greyhawk was the 1983 gold box set, but no doubt others prefer the 1980 folio, the 1988 hardcover, etc. I suspect that none of the published products closely resembles the original 1970s home game that Luke Gygax remembers, but that is OK. D&D settings should be whatever DMs and players want to make of them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Melf's Guide to Greyhawk: The Shield Lands
Top