Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Merged] Hackmaster reviews?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rounser" data-source="post: 369279" data-attributes="member: 1106"><p>They don't have an AD&D license, nor do they have the "AD&D core rules as a basic engine that everything Hackmaster...could be plugged into." Hackmaster uses large wodges of AD&D text and intellectual property unchanged. Look at the druid spells in the PHB, for instance - they're lifted verbatim from AD&D, as is the guts and the majority of the "flavour crunch" (spells, monsters etc.) of the rest of the system.</p><p></p><p>It's an (A)D&D variant, using, from what I gather, all pre-3E (A)D&D intellectual property (including settings, modules, rulesets etc.) under a special license, and is in that respect unique. D&D clones have to reinvent the wheel. Unless WotC goes mad and gives everyone else a license to all of the (A)D&D intellectual property as well, it's likely to be one of a kind. If it's restricted to (A)D&D editions and variants, there is no slippery slope...the buck stops right there if you want it to.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps my differentiation between a D&D variant and a D&D clone is silly to some of you. So be it - this thread is a nitpicker's delight. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>The original Keep didn't have a setting, originally belonging to all D&D worlds and none, but was retrospectively plonked down in Mystara. Return to the Keep on the Borderlands was supposed to fit into Greyhawk, but flies in the face of GH canon, and was largely rejected by the GH fanbase without alteration - it too exists in limbo IMO. Little Keep on the Borderlands fits into Garweeze Wurld, making allusions to the original Keep. As a tribute like the Return, it is arguably more "about" the original Keep than the setting it's in.</p><p></p><p>Maybe. Some people are more interested in running Scourge of the Slavelords or Against the Giants (both of have had Returns, and which are getting HM tributes too) than they are in running Greyhawk, though. You could even argue that the cumulative footprint of Greyhawk's classic modules dwarfs the significance of the setting itself...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rounser, post: 369279, member: 1106"] They don't have an AD&D license, nor do they have the "AD&D core rules as a basic engine that everything Hackmaster...could be plugged into." Hackmaster uses large wodges of AD&D text and intellectual property unchanged. Look at the druid spells in the PHB, for instance - they're lifted verbatim from AD&D, as is the guts and the majority of the "flavour crunch" (spells, monsters etc.) of the rest of the system. It's an (A)D&D variant, using, from what I gather, all pre-3E (A)D&D intellectual property (including settings, modules, rulesets etc.) under a special license, and is in that respect unique. D&D clones have to reinvent the wheel. Unless WotC goes mad and gives everyone else a license to all of the (A)D&D intellectual property as well, it's likely to be one of a kind. If it's restricted to (A)D&D editions and variants, there is no slippery slope...the buck stops right there if you want it to. Perhaps my differentiation between a D&D variant and a D&D clone is silly to some of you. So be it - this thread is a nitpicker's delight. :D The original Keep didn't have a setting, originally belonging to all D&D worlds and none, but was retrospectively plonked down in Mystara. Return to the Keep on the Borderlands was supposed to fit into Greyhawk, but flies in the face of GH canon, and was largely rejected by the GH fanbase without alteration - it too exists in limbo IMO. Little Keep on the Borderlands fits into Garweeze Wurld, making allusions to the original Keep. As a tribute like the Return, it is arguably more "about" the original Keep than the setting it's in. Maybe. Some people are more interested in running Scourge of the Slavelords or Against the Giants (both of have had Returns, and which are getting HM tributes too) than they are in running Greyhawk, though. You could even argue that the cumulative footprint of Greyhawk's classic modules dwarfs the significance of the setting itself... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Merged] Hackmaster reviews?
Top