Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6310947" data-attributes="member: 7006">Never go out of your way to try and placate whiners.&nbsp; WotC doesn't write their books to do it.&nbsp; You as the DM shouldn't either.If someone wants to use something you (as DM) have already said 'no' on... they can either accept it, not play in your game, or try and make cogent reasons why they should be allowed to.&nbsp; You then can make your decision based on their arguments.And if they whine that they should be &quot;allowed&quot; to simply because it appears in a book... you tell that person to grow up and accept your ruling for your specific campaign or not play.But in no way should any of the D&amp;D documents ever be edited in such a way to specifically try and make those whiners feel better and get their way.&nbsp; Things will be included or not included in the books because they serve a purpose that way, not because it's to strictly minimize complaints.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6310947, member: 7006"] Never go out of your way to try and placate whiners. WotC doesn't write their books to do it. You as the DM shouldn't either. If someone wants to use something you (as DM) have already said 'no' on... they can either accept it, not play in your game, or try and make cogent reasons why they should be allowed to. You then can make your decision based on their arguments. And if they whine that they should be "allowed" to simply because it appears in a book... you tell that person to grow up and accept your ruling for your specific campaign or not play. But in no way should any of the D&D documents ever be edited in such a way to specifically try and make those whiners feel better and get their way. Things will be included or not included in the books because they [I][B]serve a purpose[/B][/I] that way, not because it's to strictly minimize complaints. [/QUOTE]

Verification