Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Meta engine of 3.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manabarbs" data-source="post: 6115542" data-attributes="member: 6717251"><p>There's additional complication when you look at the whole edition in that the design itself doesn't treat various features as having a constant cost. There are two strains of design in 3.5 expansion books (with some stuff in the middle.) The first recognizes that the PHB is home to most of the strongest and most of the weakest classes in the entire edition, and essentially abandons the PHB's valuation of the relative worth of different features, shooting for a middle ground. The drawback of this design is that it tended to produce classes that were either obsolete on arrival and mostly thematic choices as a result (Warmage), in the cases where the class was a fairer version of a very powerful class, or classes that made the PHB classes look like chumps (Warblade). The second strain of design treats the PHB classes as acceptable baselines and bases the relatively value of things around that. These designs essentially agree to roll with the PHB's estimates, which means that the designs produced by this method tend to fall fairly close in power level to the PHB classes they're based on. The drawback of this design strategy is that it produced additional crazy powerful monster classes (Archivist) along with more total wastes of space (Samurai).</p><p></p><p>Designs that use the first strategy essentially are reassigning the abstract "point values" that the PHB picked; they recognize that no, having a large HD and a full BAB is not on its own around as good as having access to a massive spell list.</p><p></p><p>It's also difficult to weigh things across the edition's lifespan because the value of things changes over time, although not all things. If "d10 HD" is a 20-point feature with just the PHB, it remains somewhere in that range even when you throw in all of the edition's material. If "unrestricted access to the cleric spell list" is a 600-point feature with just the PHB, though, it might be a 1200-point feature with everything accessible because that's more spells.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manabarbs, post: 6115542, member: 6717251"] There's additional complication when you look at the whole edition in that the design itself doesn't treat various features as having a constant cost. There are two strains of design in 3.5 expansion books (with some stuff in the middle.) The first recognizes that the PHB is home to most of the strongest and most of the weakest classes in the entire edition, and essentially abandons the PHB's valuation of the relative worth of different features, shooting for a middle ground. The drawback of this design is that it tended to produce classes that were either obsolete on arrival and mostly thematic choices as a result (Warmage), in the cases where the class was a fairer version of a very powerful class, or classes that made the PHB classes look like chumps (Warblade). The second strain of design treats the PHB classes as acceptable baselines and bases the relatively value of things around that. These designs essentially agree to roll with the PHB's estimates, which means that the designs produced by this method tend to fall fairly close in power level to the PHB classes they're based on. The drawback of this design strategy is that it produced additional crazy powerful monster classes (Archivist) along with more total wastes of space (Samurai). Designs that use the first strategy essentially are reassigning the abstract "point values" that the PHB picked; they recognize that no, having a large HD and a full BAB is not on its own around as good as having access to a massive spell list. It's also difficult to weigh things across the edition's lifespan because the value of things changes over time, although not all things. If "d10 HD" is a 20-point feature with just the PHB, it remains somewhere in that range even when you throw in all of the edition's material. If "unrestricted access to the cleric spell list" is a 600-point feature with just the PHB, though, it might be a 1200-point feature with everything accessible because that's more spells. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Meta engine of 3.5
Top