Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
metamagic feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6049397" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Right now they're doing exactly what they should be doing.</p><p></p><p>They take the stuff they've come up with... and seeing how far they can go with it. At some point they'll reach a point of diminishing returns and they'll pull back. But they won't know what that point is until they put it out there for people to test.</p><p></p><p>That's what they're doing with Expertise Dice.</p><p></p><p>They made them for Fighters, people mostly seemed to like them, they wondered if they could be an effective "martial" system, they trotted them out for Rogues, now they go even further by trotting them out for Monks. Now what will happen is that when they receive feedback... they'll either find out that most players really like the mechanic for the Rogue and Monk too (and thus pretty soon we'll see a packet that uses ED for the paladin, ranger, and barbarian)... or they'll be told in no uncertain terms that the ED are now less interesting and watered-down because they don't fit the Monk and/or Rogue (and thus another packet down the line will revert them back to Fighter-only).</p><p></p><p>But you can't find any of this out UNTIL you actually offer it up to people... and give them a chance to actually see the rule before coming to the conclusion that it's a P.O.S.</p><p></p><p>All we can do as playtesters is be honest and frank in the surveys and feedback... and hope that what we see is similar to most of the other players out there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6049397, member: 7006"] Right now they're doing exactly what they should be doing. They take the stuff they've come up with... and seeing how far they can go with it. At some point they'll reach a point of diminishing returns and they'll pull back. But they won't know what that point is until they put it out there for people to test. That's what they're doing with Expertise Dice. They made them for Fighters, people mostly seemed to like them, they wondered if they could be an effective "martial" system, they trotted them out for Rogues, now they go even further by trotting them out for Monks. Now what will happen is that when they receive feedback... they'll either find out that most players really like the mechanic for the Rogue and Monk too (and thus pretty soon we'll see a packet that uses ED for the paladin, ranger, and barbarian)... or they'll be told in no uncertain terms that the ED are now less interesting and watered-down because they don't fit the Monk and/or Rogue (and thus another packet down the line will revert them back to Fighter-only). But you can't find any of this out UNTIL you actually offer it up to people... and give them a chance to actually see the rule before coming to the conclusion that it's a P.O.S. All we can do as playtesters is be honest and frank in the surveys and feedback... and hope that what we see is similar to most of the other players out there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
metamagic feats
Top