Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Metamagic Rods - Wiz vs Sor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Falling Icicle" data-source="post: 1476916" data-attributes="member: 17077"><p>Of course Sorcerers are optimized to being artillery. I've never said anything to the contrary. But I have pointed out that Sorcerers pay for that with alot of drawbacks. But Wizards also get a huge mileage out of metamagic rods that Sorcerers don't need. Wizards have to normally prepare the metamagic ahead of time when he prepares the spell. This significantly inhibits his flexibility with metamagics. So I can also argue that, in many ways, Wizards benefit more from metamagic rods than Sorcerers do since Sorcerers already have that flexibility. Sorcerers are already the metamagic kings. These rods simply give them a few free per day. The Wizard, on the other hand, benefits from them immensly.</p><p></p><p>Yeah, your example of the repeated fireballs is a good example of the differences between Wizards and Sorcerers. But, correct me if I'm wrong, it seems to me as though your impression is that Sorcerers are better than Wizards and, as such, should suffer some extra disadvantages. If that is what you think, let me assure you, as one who has played and thoroughly enjoyed both classes, that Sorcerers are <strong>not</strong> better than Wizards. They are better at certain things, of course, but the opposite is also true. A Wizard is much less likely to be able to pull off the same spell over and over again as a Sorcerer is. But, the Wizard has a huge, huge, advantage in spell selection. </p><p></p><p>Let's take a typical 6th level Sorcerer, for example. He will have one 3rd level spell, usually Fireball. With bonus spells, he should be able to cast it 4 times per day or so. The Wizard, on the other hand, can prepare multiple, different 3rd level spells. While such a Wizard won't do as well in a battle where fireball is the best spell to use, he can also win out because of his greater versatility. What if you're fighting in a battle where fireball isn't useful? What if there is a different 3rd level spell that is needed? The Sorcerer is pretty useless if he doesn't have the spell that is needed. </p><p></p><p>The Wizard, though, may still excel because he had thought to prepare other spells that would be useful. Wizards can also do something that Sorcerers can't. A Wizard who is thoughtful and intelligent enough to gather information about his enemy can prepare a devastating combination of spells that are perfectly designed to exploit that specific enemy's weaknesses. He can also prepare from a wide assortment of spells so that no matter what he runs into, he'll have something to use. And he can scirbe scrolls of spells he has learned, but infrequently prepares, just in case. While the Sorcerer is indeed the most powerful combat caster, he suffers from a severe lack of options due to an extremely small spell selection. Both classes are powerful, just in very different ways.</p><p></p><p>And, IMHO, Wizards and Sorcerers both get the same amount of "synergy" from metamagic rods, though the way it benefits them is different, much in the way that they use magic differently. Both Wizards and Sorcerers have a drawback when using metamagics. Both casters have to give up a higher level spell slot, that's a given. But Wizards also suffer from preparation and Sorcerers (much less so) from an extended casting time. Both casters have a drawback, but, Quicken aside, Sorcerers are the kings of metamagic. Got grappled? Apply Still spell. Gagged or Silenced? Apply Silent Spell. Too far away? Apply Enlarge Spell. Sorcerers can do this. Wizards can't. And, IMO, the ability to spontaneously apply metamagics in the same way Sorcerers do makes metamagic rods immensly useful to Wizards. Taking that into consideration, I simply don't think it is at all accurate to say Wizards get less synergy from these rods than Sorcerers do. I crave and horde them jealously as either class.</p><p></p><p>What Thanee and I find extremely unfair is that the Wizard completely gets rid of his metamagic disadvantage with these rods, but Sorcerers do not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Falling Icicle, post: 1476916, member: 17077"] Of course Sorcerers are optimized to being artillery. I've never said anything to the contrary. But I have pointed out that Sorcerers pay for that with alot of drawbacks. But Wizards also get a huge mileage out of metamagic rods that Sorcerers don't need. Wizards have to normally prepare the metamagic ahead of time when he prepares the spell. This significantly inhibits his flexibility with metamagics. So I can also argue that, in many ways, Wizards benefit more from metamagic rods than Sorcerers do since Sorcerers already have that flexibility. Sorcerers are already the metamagic kings. These rods simply give them a few free per day. The Wizard, on the other hand, benefits from them immensly. Yeah, your example of the repeated fireballs is a good example of the differences between Wizards and Sorcerers. But, correct me if I'm wrong, it seems to me as though your impression is that Sorcerers are better than Wizards and, as such, should suffer some extra disadvantages. If that is what you think, let me assure you, as one who has played and thoroughly enjoyed both classes, that Sorcerers are [b]not[/b] better than Wizards. They are better at certain things, of course, but the opposite is also true. A Wizard is much less likely to be able to pull off the same spell over and over again as a Sorcerer is. But, the Wizard has a huge, huge, advantage in spell selection. Let's take a typical 6th level Sorcerer, for example. He will have one 3rd level spell, usually Fireball. With bonus spells, he should be able to cast it 4 times per day or so. The Wizard, on the other hand, can prepare multiple, different 3rd level spells. While such a Wizard won't do as well in a battle where fireball is the best spell to use, he can also win out because of his greater versatility. What if you're fighting in a battle where fireball isn't useful? What if there is a different 3rd level spell that is needed? The Sorcerer is pretty useless if he doesn't have the spell that is needed. The Wizard, though, may still excel because he had thought to prepare other spells that would be useful. Wizards can also do something that Sorcerers can't. A Wizard who is thoughtful and intelligent enough to gather information about his enemy can prepare a devastating combination of spells that are perfectly designed to exploit that specific enemy's weaknesses. He can also prepare from a wide assortment of spells so that no matter what he runs into, he'll have something to use. And he can scirbe scrolls of spells he has learned, but infrequently prepares, just in case. While the Sorcerer is indeed the most powerful combat caster, he suffers from a severe lack of options due to an extremely small spell selection. Both classes are powerful, just in very different ways. And, IMHO, Wizards and Sorcerers both get the same amount of "synergy" from metamagic rods, though the way it benefits them is different, much in the way that they use magic differently. Both Wizards and Sorcerers have a drawback when using metamagics. Both casters have to give up a higher level spell slot, that's a given. But Wizards also suffer from preparation and Sorcerers (much less so) from an extended casting time. Both casters have a drawback, but, Quicken aside, Sorcerers are the kings of metamagic. Got grappled? Apply Still spell. Gagged or Silenced? Apply Silent Spell. Too far away? Apply Enlarge Spell. Sorcerers can do this. Wizards can't. And, IMO, the ability to spontaneously apply metamagics in the same way Sorcerers do makes metamagic rods immensly useful to Wizards. Taking that into consideration, I simply don't think it is at all accurate to say Wizards get less synergy from these rods than Sorcerers do. I crave and horde them jealously as either class. What Thanee and I find extremely unfair is that the Wizard completely gets rid of his metamagic disadvantage with these rods, but Sorcerers do not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Metamagic Rods - Wiz vs Sor
Top