Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 3450172" data-attributes="member: 2525">You must think you were responding to something different than what you actually responded to.You dismissed the FAQ, and all non-core books, for all purposes, across the board.  Not just for this topic.  Not just for core vs. non-core sources.  But for all topics of any kind, even if non-core vs. non-core, and even if all we are talking about is a vague rule.  Here is what I said: "Yeah I am also getting tired of the "If it's not in a core book or errata, it doesn't count" response."And here is your response: "But it doesn't! And I am getting tired of people insisting that it does."Really?  You are tired of people insisting that non-core publications have value of any kind?  Then why are you using the Complete Warrior rule?  Why are you using swift and immediate actions.  Why are you even engaging in a discussion of a MIC item when in your opinion "If it's not in a core book or errata, it doesn't count"?</blockquote>