Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mike Mearls comments on design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 3933938" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>Most certainly true.</p><p></p><p>Customization will be very easy.</p><p></p><p>And with GWA it will be something like this:</p><p></p><p>DM: I've removed Elves.</p><p>Player: OK</p><p>DM: I've removed Fly.</p><p>Player: OK</p><p>DM: I've removed Teleport.</p><p>Player: OK</p><p>DM: Fireball is called Jack's Flaming Revenge.</p><p>Player: OK</p><p>DM: Golden Wyvern Adept is called Spell Tactics.</p><p>Player: What was that again? Was that the one that gives you a +2 to overcome spell resistance if you move first?</p><p>DM: No, no, that was Purple River Sage, though in my game it is called Spell Placement.</p><p>Player: ohh.. I thought the River thing was the one that gave you +3 to hit when you jump. </p><p>DM: No, that was... Ah crap, Let's play GURPS.</p><p></p><p>Exaggeration? Yeah. But there is a fundamental difference between communicating changes built on a simple descriptive system and communicating changes in a system that requires memorization of random nomenclature. Renaming or removing GWA will be no harder than renaming or removing elves. Which is to say it will be trivially easy. Expecting a group of casual players to keep up with changes around GWA will be significantly harder than expecting them to keep up with "no elves". If they kept elves in 4E but instead of elves they called them Hoos Hoos, you could tell a player that you have removed Hoos Hoos and it wouldn't be unreasonable for a casual player to say, "ok, thats fine. As long as I can play an Elf I don't care."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 3933938, member: 957"] Most certainly true. Customization will be very easy. And with GWA it will be something like this: DM: I've removed Elves. Player: OK DM: I've removed Fly. Player: OK DM: I've removed Teleport. Player: OK DM: Fireball is called Jack's Flaming Revenge. Player: OK DM: Golden Wyvern Adept is called Spell Tactics. Player: What was that again? Was that the one that gives you a +2 to overcome spell resistance if you move first? DM: No, no, that was Purple River Sage, though in my game it is called Spell Placement. Player: ohh.. I thought the River thing was the one that gave you +3 to hit when you jump. DM: No, that was... Ah crap, Let's play GURPS. Exaggeration? Yeah. But there is a fundamental difference between communicating changes built on a simple descriptive system and communicating changes in a system that requires memorization of random nomenclature. Renaming or removing GWA will be no harder than renaming or removing elves. Which is to say it will be trivially easy. Expecting a group of casual players to keep up with changes around GWA will be significantly harder than expecting them to keep up with "no elves". If they kept elves in 4E but instead of elves they called them Hoos Hoos, you could tell a player that you have removed Hoos Hoos and it wouldn't be unreasonable for a casual player to say, "ok, thats fine. As long as I can play an Elf I don't care." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mike Mearls comments on design
Top