Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls did an interview for Escapist Magazine and reveals PHB classes, races, and much more
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 6309321" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Very good news on the PHB races, I think. This way absolutely everyone is covered, which is in-tune with the "D&D for everyone" deal WotC have pushed re: 5E.</p><p></p><p>Interesting too that it seems most races have at least two "kinds" to choose from - this could also really help out, providing us with, say, a 2E-style Tiefling and a 4E-style one. I think four kinds of elf would really cover everything - High, Wood, Tricksy/Eladrin/Moon (there are plenty of other settings which have a "Tricksy" kind of elf known for vanishing into nowhere - Taladas, for one), and Drow. I'll be interested to see if the PHB defaults to the FR descriptors or more generic descriptors (presuming the latter).</p><p></p><p>Like Kamikaze, I'm intrigued by the class building guidelines, that could be one of the most interesting, or, of course, most entirely useless, parts of the book (2E's class building was a horrible mess, but did at least let you build the Kai/Magna-Kai if you were willing to spend 3000xp to reach level 1!).</p><p></p><p>In general the information seems very positive. I'm skeptical of some elements of 5E, but the overall thought put into the design and release seems to be very solid, perhaps more solid than any previous edition.</p><p></p><p> [MENTION=98772]Ichneumon[/MENTION] - I very much doubt that we'll see anything like Battlesystem, or that a smaller number of high-level monsters means we'll be fighting large groups of them (if that's what you meant). More likely, we'll be looking at a 2E kind of scenario, more often than not, with one or a small number of really serious monsters, and a between a handful and a few dozen henchmonsters of much, much lower level, but who are still a threat in large numbers because of the flatter math. 2E never needed special rules to deal with that.</p><p></p><p>The only worry there is that, in 2E, to deal with that kind of scenario, you generally needed a caster capable of putting out a lot of AE damage (unless the monsters were less than 1HD, in which case a Fighter was fine if a little dice-intensive!), and I don't think it's really viable to hard-require that in this day and age, especially when they're providing a such a wide variety of classes, and so few of them can deal with AE situations well. So if that's the default they will probably need some "cutting a bloody swathe"-type rules for classes with multiple attacks hitting blocks of enemies with sufficient level difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 6309321, member: 18"] Very good news on the PHB races, I think. This way absolutely everyone is covered, which is in-tune with the "D&D for everyone" deal WotC have pushed re: 5E. Interesting too that it seems most races have at least two "kinds" to choose from - this could also really help out, providing us with, say, a 2E-style Tiefling and a 4E-style one. I think four kinds of elf would really cover everything - High, Wood, Tricksy/Eladrin/Moon (there are plenty of other settings which have a "Tricksy" kind of elf known for vanishing into nowhere - Taladas, for one), and Drow. I'll be interested to see if the PHB defaults to the FR descriptors or more generic descriptors (presuming the latter). Like Kamikaze, I'm intrigued by the class building guidelines, that could be one of the most interesting, or, of course, most entirely useless, parts of the book (2E's class building was a horrible mess, but did at least let you build the Kai/Magna-Kai if you were willing to spend 3000xp to reach level 1!). In general the information seems very positive. I'm skeptical of some elements of 5E, but the overall thought put into the design and release seems to be very solid, perhaps more solid than any previous edition. [MENTION=98772]Ichneumon[/MENTION] - I very much doubt that we'll see anything like Battlesystem, or that a smaller number of high-level monsters means we'll be fighting large groups of them (if that's what you meant). More likely, we'll be looking at a 2E kind of scenario, more often than not, with one or a small number of really serious monsters, and a between a handful and a few dozen henchmonsters of much, much lower level, but who are still a threat in large numbers because of the flatter math. 2E never needed special rules to deal with that. The only worry there is that, in 2E, to deal with that kind of scenario, you generally needed a caster capable of putting out a lot of AE damage (unless the monsters were less than 1HD, in which case a Fighter was fine if a little dice-intensive!), and I don't think it's really viable to hard-require that in this day and age, especially when they're providing a such a wide variety of classes, and so few of them can deal with AE situations well. So if that's the default they will probably need some "cutting a bloody swathe"-type rules for classes with multiple attacks hitting blocks of enemies with sufficient level difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls did an interview for Escapist Magazine and reveals PHB classes, races, and much more
Top