Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7526616" data-attributes="member: 1465">Yes, I agree, better not to do it at all costs on a class if there is no good idea.I wouldn't touch iconic and unique features such as Barbarian's Rage and Rogue's Sneak Attack... even smaller stuff like Action Surge and Second Wind should not be removed, otherwise it leaves the Fighter class without its own unique and distinctive features, it would end up being an empty shell of a class.I would in general like if they at least addressed all classes, and see if there is one non-essential or controversial feature that could have an alternate option. If they provide an alternate for Ranger spellcasting, then quite naturally something similar could be done for Paladins. I'd also consider an alterate to Druid wildshape, even tho this is very iconic, I think the Druid's spells and other nature-related abilities are enough for the class concept to stand up.It's also true that some classes already have alternate class features, for example we have several possible Fighting Styles, Warlock's Pact Boons, or Sorcerer's Metamagic. So it'd be just as valuable to get a couple more options to choose from for each of those. Maybe even a few more Totem Warrior's animals and Four Element Monk's powers.</blockquote>