Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls explains why your boss monsters die too easily
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BenjaminPey" data-source="post: 9773377" data-attributes="member: 7039344"><p>A topic as old as 5E, if not older. And every time I personnally struggle to see any kind of problem. </p><p></p><p>I mean, sure, if you're there for a pure tactical-puzzle solving wargame, you'd have to to follow the 6-8 encounters advice and the story might feel tedious or disjointed, but... you're not here for the story, but for the tactical-puzzle solving. So, it's all good. You can play like that, as written.</p><p></p><p>And if you don't particularly care about this and are here mainly for the story and the occasional thrill of combat and adventure, as many casual players are (and I mean casual here as in "casual players of DnD specifically", they can nevertheless be hardcore rpg players), well, who cares about the 6-8 encounters? One really tough battle once in a while will be enough, and it's trivially easy to imagine one on the DM side, especially in 5E24 whose encounter building rules seem exactly built for that; centered around a single encounter, rather than the adventuring day.</p><p></p><p>Sure, you'll have some swingy results, but isn't it best for the story, if that's what you're after? Given that 0 HP is almost never a synonym of ultimate death, given that you can always surrendrer or flee or whatever, I fail to see how this kind of outputs, the unexpected openings of surprising story paths, would be a problem — provided once again that the wargaming aspect is secondary, that you're not here, or not here exclusively, for a balanced challenge.</p><p></p><p>I'll add that is also one of the best ways, IMO, to play engaging battles: </p><p>— engaging because they will be quick, around the three rounds mark and the 20-30 minutes of play which are close to the optimum time for casual players, </p><p>— engaging because they don't have to be played to the last hit point, hence avoiding the final unintersting slog when the outcome is already known,</p><p>—engaging because they won't ever be filler battles. All will have a narrative purpose, a narrative goal and several different interesting outcomes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BenjaminPey, post: 9773377, member: 7039344"] A topic as old as 5E, if not older. And every time I personnally struggle to see any kind of problem. I mean, sure, if you're there for a pure tactical-puzzle solving wargame, you'd have to to follow the 6-8 encounters advice and the story might feel tedious or disjointed, but... you're not here for the story, but for the tactical-puzzle solving. So, it's all good. You can play like that, as written. And if you don't particularly care about this and are here mainly for the story and the occasional thrill of combat and adventure, as many casual players are (and I mean casual here as in "casual players of DnD specifically", they can nevertheless be hardcore rpg players), well, who cares about the 6-8 encounters? One really tough battle once in a while will be enough, and it's trivially easy to imagine one on the DM side, especially in 5E24 whose encounter building rules seem exactly built for that; centered around a single encounter, rather than the adventuring day. Sure, you'll have some swingy results, but isn't it best for the story, if that's what you're after? Given that 0 HP is almost never a synonym of ultimate death, given that you can always surrendrer or flee or whatever, I fail to see how this kind of outputs, the unexpected openings of surprising story paths, would be a problem — provided once again that the wargaming aspect is secondary, that you're not here, or not here exclusively, for a balanced challenge. I'll add that is also one of the best ways, IMO, to play engaging battles: — engaging because they will be quick, around the three rounds mark and the 20-30 minutes of play which are close to the optimum time for casual players, — engaging because they don't have to be played to the last hit point, hence avoiding the final unintersting slog when the outcome is already known, —engaging because they won't ever be filler battles. All will have a narrative purpose, a narrative goal and several different interesting outcomes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls explains why your boss monsters die too easily
Top