Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls explains why your boss monsters die too easily
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="M_Natas" data-source="post: 9781131" data-attributes="member: 7025918"><p>Hrm, yes and no.</p><p>The loss of the multiplier increases a fight against 2 monsters by 50% and against 3 to 6 monsters by 100%, against 7 to 10 monsters by 250%.</p><p></p><p>But at the same time, a 200xp cr 1 creature is (according to 5.5e) equal to 4 cr 1/4 (50xp) creatures. So the ressource draining should be similiar.</p><p>I would say, that 5e just undervalued multiple monsters (like, one of them most common fixes was to ignore the multiplier).</p><p></p><p>At the same time ... I would have to build some encounters to just see that.</p><p>Okay, let's give it a go.</p><p></p><p><strong>Level 1 Party</strong></p><p>Bandits are 25xp each. So 4 bandits should be equal to 1 gnoll warrior (100xp).</p><p></p><p>Bandits</p><p>AC 12 --> Hitchance against +5 = 70%</p><p>HP 44 (4x11) --> adjusted HP = 62 / 15,7 per Bandit (accounting for Hitchance)</p><p>Attack +3, 5 damage x4 --> Hitchance against AC 15 = 45% --> adjusted damage 9.</p><p></p><p>Gnoll warrior</p><p>AC 15 --> Hitchance against +5 = 55%.</p><p>HP 27 --> adjusted HP= 49</p><p>Attack +4, 5 damage --> Hitchance against AC 15 = 50% --> adjusted damage 2,5</p><p>Special: Rampage once (one additional attack)</p><p></p><p>Okay, at first glance it looks like 4 bandits are harder than 1 gnoll warrior.</p><p></p><p>Now let's look at the actual fight.</p><p></p><p>Our party are 2 fighters and 2 wizards at level 1 (thats where I have the math for ready to go <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ).</p><p>On average a Character will do 10 damage per round of adjusted HP (accounting for hitchance).</p><p>So on average 3 bandits will be killed in round one, the last one in round two. The bandits will approximately deal 11 damage to the party (assuming every bandits could Attack each round).</p><p></p><p>The gnoll warrior will be killed in round 2. The gnoll warrior will deal approximately 7,5 damage to the party (assuming the Gnoll Warrior could attack each round and use his special ability in round 2).</p><p></p><p>The bandits have a chance, by concentrating attacks, to down on PC. The Gnoll only if he attacks a wizard.</p><p></p><p>Okay, let's take another 100xp creature - a scout.</p><p>AC 13 - Hitchance 65%</p><p>HP 16 --> adjusted 25</p><p>Attack +4, 6 damage, twice. Hitchance against AC 15 = 50%. So 6 damage per round.</p><p></p><p>Hrm. That ends worse than the Gnoll Warrior. Dies in round 1, making 6 damage. </p><p></p><p>Okay, so a 100xp encounter is no good, anyway.</p><p></p><p>Let's make it interesting. </p><p>Deadly/High encounter. 400xp budget.</p><p></p><p>Single creature ... needs to be 450xp.</p><p></p><p>Awakened tree</p><p>Ac 13 --> 65% hitchance.</p><p>HP: 59 --> adjusted 90HP.</p><p>Attack: +6 for 14 damage. - adjusted 7,7 damage.</p><p></p><p>It will take our party of 4 approximately 3 rounds to take that tree down while at the same time 1,5 party members could go down. If we account for a part member to go down in round 2, there is still a 40% Chance that the tree will go down in round 3, if not than in round 4 (not accounting for 4 damage).</p><p></p><p>Goblin rading party:</p><p>Golbin Boss + 5 Goblin Warriors = 450xp.</p><p>AC 17 (45%) & 15 (55%)</p><p>HP 21 & 10 (×5) = 47 HP & 18HP (x5) = 137 HP total.</p><p>Attacks: Boss = +4 5 damage x2, Warriors: +4 5 damage x5.</p><p></p><p>Not accounting here for advantage or.nimble escape ...</p><p>First round the Goblin raiding party makes 17,5 damage, downing at least one PC, the PCs take out 2 Goblin warriors.</p><p>Round 2: Goblins take out another 2 PC, PCs take out another Goblin Warrior ... and TPK.</p><p></p><p>Damn. Without advantage and nimble escape.</p><p></p><p>But to be fair ...</p><p>A Green Dragon Wyrmling (450xp) would also TPK our first levels party in round 1 with its poison breath.</p><p></p><p>But the problem could be Level 1, which is quite deadly.</p><p>Let's do level 4.</p><p></p><p><strong>Level4 party</strong></p><p></p><p>Hiigh/Deadly XP budget: 2000xp.</p><p></p><p>Single Creature: Earth Elemental (CR5, 1800xp)</p><p></p><p>AC 17 (Hitchance 50%)</p><p>HP 147, adjusted 294</p><p>Attack +8, 14 damage x2 (70 Hitchance) --> adjusted damage 9,8x2 = 20.</p><p></p><p>Puh, a slog fest. If no PC goes down, it will take 5 rounds to take out the earth elemental. </p><p>The Elemental will take out a PC every second round. Off, at least 2, even 3 PCs could go down if we assume average rolls on everything.</p><p></p><p>Now ... 4 Gricks (450xp x 4 = 1800xp)</p><p>AC 14 (65% Hitchance)</p><p>HP 54 (×4) - adjusted 83 x4 = 332 HP.</p><p>Attack: +4 for 9 and for 7 damage.16 damage, adjusted to 8 - 4 times.</p><p></p><p>Hrm equally hard. So, the PCs will struggle to take kn Grick down jn round 1, whe the gricks will take one PC down in round 1. It again would take 5 rounds to take them down if no PC goes down.</p><p>So Round 1: one PC down.</p><p>Round 2: One Grick down one PC down</p><p>Round 3: 1 Grick down.</p><p>Round 4: 1 PC down ...</p><p></p><p>Okay, that could easily be a TPK.</p><p></p><p>So at first, I would start with moderate encounters in 5.5e, then go from there and see how well the party performs. But damn, high encounters seem really to hit harder, even for rested parties.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="M_Natas, post: 9781131, member: 7025918"] Hrm, yes and no. The loss of the multiplier increases a fight against 2 monsters by 50% and against 3 to 6 monsters by 100%, against 7 to 10 monsters by 250%. But at the same time, a 200xp cr 1 creature is (according to 5.5e) equal to 4 cr 1/4 (50xp) creatures. So the ressource draining should be similiar. I would say, that 5e just undervalued multiple monsters (like, one of them most common fixes was to ignore the multiplier). At the same time ... I would have to build some encounters to just see that. Okay, let's give it a go. [B]Level 1 Party[/B] Bandits are 25xp each. So 4 bandits should be equal to 1 gnoll warrior (100xp). Bandits AC 12 --> Hitchance against +5 = 70% HP 44 (4x11) --> adjusted HP = 62 / 15,7 per Bandit (accounting for Hitchance) Attack +3, 5 damage x4 --> Hitchance against AC 15 = 45% --> adjusted damage 9. Gnoll warrior AC 15 --> Hitchance against +5 = 55%. HP 27 --> adjusted HP= 49 Attack +4, 5 damage --> Hitchance against AC 15 = 50% --> adjusted damage 2,5 Special: Rampage once (one additional attack) Okay, at first glance it looks like 4 bandits are harder than 1 gnoll warrior. Now let's look at the actual fight. Our party are 2 fighters and 2 wizards at level 1 (thats where I have the math for ready to go :) ). On average a Character will do 10 damage per round of adjusted HP (accounting for hitchance). So on average 3 bandits will be killed in round one, the last one in round two. The bandits will approximately deal 11 damage to the party (assuming every bandits could Attack each round). The gnoll warrior will be killed in round 2. The gnoll warrior will deal approximately 7,5 damage to the party (assuming the Gnoll Warrior could attack each round and use his special ability in round 2). The bandits have a chance, by concentrating attacks, to down on PC. The Gnoll only if he attacks a wizard. Okay, let's take another 100xp creature - a scout. AC 13 - Hitchance 65% HP 16 --> adjusted 25 Attack +4, 6 damage, twice. Hitchance against AC 15 = 50%. So 6 damage per round. Hrm. That ends worse than the Gnoll Warrior. Dies in round 1, making 6 damage. Okay, so a 100xp encounter is no good, anyway. Let's make it interesting. Deadly/High encounter. 400xp budget. Single creature ... needs to be 450xp. Awakened tree Ac 13 --> 65% hitchance. HP: 59 --> adjusted 90HP. Attack: +6 for 14 damage. - adjusted 7,7 damage. It will take our party of 4 approximately 3 rounds to take that tree down while at the same time 1,5 party members could go down. If we account for a part member to go down in round 2, there is still a 40% Chance that the tree will go down in round 3, if not than in round 4 (not accounting for 4 damage). Goblin rading party: Golbin Boss + 5 Goblin Warriors = 450xp. AC 17 (45%) & 15 (55%) HP 21 & 10 (×5) = 47 HP & 18HP (x5) = 137 HP total. Attacks: Boss = +4 5 damage x2, Warriors: +4 5 damage x5. Not accounting here for advantage or.nimble escape ... First round the Goblin raiding party makes 17,5 damage, downing at least one PC, the PCs take out 2 Goblin warriors. Round 2: Goblins take out another 2 PC, PCs take out another Goblin Warrior ... and TPK. Damn. Without advantage and nimble escape. But to be fair ... A Green Dragon Wyrmling (450xp) would also TPK our first levels party in round 1 with its poison breath. But the problem could be Level 1, which is quite deadly. Let's do level 4. [B]Level4 party[/B] Hiigh/Deadly XP budget: 2000xp. Single Creature: Earth Elemental (CR5, 1800xp) AC 17 (Hitchance 50%) HP 147, adjusted 294 Attack +8, 14 damage x2 (70 Hitchance) --> adjusted damage 9,8x2 = 20. Puh, a slog fest. If no PC goes down, it will take 5 rounds to take out the earth elemental. The Elemental will take out a PC every second round. Off, at least 2, even 3 PCs could go down if we assume average rolls on everything. Now ... 4 Gricks (450xp x 4 = 1800xp) AC 14 (65% Hitchance) HP 54 (×4) - adjusted 83 x4 = 332 HP. Attack: +4 for 9 and for 7 damage.16 damage, adjusted to 8 - 4 times. Hrm equally hard. So, the PCs will struggle to take kn Grick down jn round 1, whe the gricks will take one PC down in round 1. It again would take 5 rounds to take them down if no PC goes down. So Round 1: one PC down. Round 2: One Grick down one PC down Round 3: 1 Grick down. Round 4: 1 PC down ... Okay, that could easily be a TPK. So at first, I would start with moderate encounters in 5.5e, then go from there and see how well the party performs. But damn, high encounters seem really to hit harder, even for rested parties. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls explains why your boss monsters die too easily
Top