Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls Happy Fun Hour: The Warlord
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7363452" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>At the unacknowledged 'role' layer, the Cleric, Bard, Druid & even Paladin all do what the Warlord did - they still have their "leader" capabilities, just more besides (the Paladin was only a secondary leader, and didn't exactly keep all his Defender toys, but that's another issue).</p><p></p><p>But, viewed that way, every class does stuff other classes do, just differently (or not so differently, but with different fluff (or with similar fluff, but different emphasis (OK, I'm still having trouble with Druid v Cleric v Paladin here<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt="(:" title="Smile (:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname="(:" />:sigh:<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />))). </p><p>Anyway, 4 classes do support, they all do it, in large part, with spells. There's not a precedent for scraping full-casting off a class with a sub-class. It'd seem an inelegant solution even by D&D standards.</p><p></p><p> Doing both (/some/ of the former, anyway, not every class needs a sub-class of every other class) would be very much in keeping with 5e design - existing fractional-wizard sub-classes as you point out, and, for that matter, the Bladesinger on the other side of that coin - and, it would increase the chances of being able to choose some sort of Warlord-lite when dropping in on a random campaign, even if the 'controversial' full Warlord class were unavailable, you still might be able to play something better than a PDK. Which is kinda the point. As Mearls said, the Eldritch Knight is there so you can play a fighter/magic-user even if the DM is too young to get that reference, and didn't opt into MCing. OK, I'm paraphrasing, there. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7363452, member: 996"] At the unacknowledged 'role' layer, the Cleric, Bard, Druid & even Paladin all do what the Warlord did - they still have their "leader" capabilities, just more besides (the Paladin was only a secondary leader, and didn't exactly keep all his Defender toys, but that's another issue). But, viewed that way, every class does stuff other classes do, just differently (or not so differently, but with different fluff (or with similar fluff, but different emphasis (OK, I'm still having trouble with Druid v Cleric v Paladin here(::sigh::)))). Anyway, 4 classes do support, they all do it, in large part, with spells. There's not a precedent for scraping full-casting off a class with a sub-class. It'd seem an inelegant solution even by D&D standards. Doing both (/some/ of the former, anyway, not every class needs a sub-class of every other class) would be very much in keeping with 5e design - existing fractional-wizard sub-classes as you point out, and, for that matter, the Bladesinger on the other side of that coin - and, it would increase the chances of being able to choose some sort of Warlord-lite when dropping in on a random campaign, even if the 'controversial' full Warlord class were unavailable, you still might be able to play something better than a PDK. Which is kinda the point. As Mearls said, the Eldritch Knight is there so you can play a fighter/magic-user even if the DM is too young to get that reference, and didn't opt into MCing. OK, I'm paraphrasing, there. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls Happy Fun Hour: The Warlord
Top