Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls Happy Fun Hour: The Warlord
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kinematics" data-source="post: 7368594" data-attributes="member: 6932123"><p>Hmm. There are advantages, but also disadvantages, to the idea.</p><p></p><p>Let's look at the cantrip-like abilities that are predicated on it being a fixed region, rather than tied to a person.</p><p></p><p>1) Enemies can't make opportunity attacks (OA) against allies moving out of the Tactical Focus area.</p><p></p><p>If you target an enemy, it mostly means that that enemy cannot ever take opportunity attacks. But it also limits the scope of your ability to provide a safe channel for people to move through, to escape an area of enemies. It feels like a weaker choice.</p><p></p><p>If you target an ally, it gives them freedom from all opportunity attacks (if you even allow it to work when the ally is never moving 'out' of a given region) for their entire movement. It feels like possibly too strong of a choice?</p><p></p><p>2) Hitting an enemy in the TF area can be moved 5'. (no saving throw)</p><p></p><p>If you target an enemy, this means you can perpetually move them on each hit, since the region moves with them. This seems overpowered at first thought, but then again, you can do the same thing to a selected enemy if you shape the region correctly, for up to 4 attacks. It just feels a bit cheap in that you can knock the enemy back any which way without any planning associated with it.</p><p></p><p>If you place it on an ally, it means basically anyone they hit, they can knock back. Again, it's possible to make this work with the region definition, but it feels cheap without it because it doesn't require any planning. Just tell the barbarian to go hit that guy. It seems to lose the sense of being the tactician.</p><p></p><p>3) Ambush: As a reaction (by the Warlord) when an enemy enters a TF square, you/allies may move half your speed. Does not use allies' reaction.</p><p></p><p>This has no real use when placed on an enemy, since they'll always be in the TF square.</p><p></p><p>If you place the TF on an ally, you get the same effect as if you had placed the region next to the ally, waiting for an enemy to approach them to within melee range. It does require you to figure out which side is their weak side, though, since you can only cover half of the area around them.</p><p></p><p>4) As part of move, can swap positions in TF area using 10' of movement.</p><p></p><p>This appears to be pointless for both setting the TF on an enemy and on an ally. The advantage of a position swap is being able to move people several squares at once; they can be up to three squares away from each other.</p><p></p><p>~~~</p><p></p><p>Most of what you can do when targeting an individual can be done using the region definition. There are a couple things that don't work quite as well going in the other direction. The <em>feel</em> of how they work when arranged in a region vs targeted on a creature, though, feels more like tactics when in a region, and more like a buff/debuff when targeting a creature.</p><p></p><p>Targeting a region is more difficult in Theater of the Mind settings, but far from impossible. Target a band between your allies and the enemy. Create a strip through the enemy line that gives an exit route. Focus on this area of the hallway, or the region in front of the door. Focus on the area the boss is standing, and the area behind him leading to the cliff. Just adding some mental 'space' seems pretty sufficient.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If we can think up more ideas of things we can do with the TF area, though (ie: more cantrip-level gambits), it can help define whether creature-targeting is useful, or whether it detracts from the design concept. I'll try to come up with a few.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kinematics, post: 7368594, member: 6932123"] Hmm. There are advantages, but also disadvantages, to the idea. Let's look at the cantrip-like abilities that are predicated on it being a fixed region, rather than tied to a person. 1) Enemies can't make opportunity attacks (OA) against allies moving out of the Tactical Focus area. If you target an enemy, it mostly means that that enemy cannot ever take opportunity attacks. But it also limits the scope of your ability to provide a safe channel for people to move through, to escape an area of enemies. It feels like a weaker choice. If you target an ally, it gives them freedom from all opportunity attacks (if you even allow it to work when the ally is never moving 'out' of a given region) for their entire movement. It feels like possibly too strong of a choice? 2) Hitting an enemy in the TF area can be moved 5'. (no saving throw) If you target an enemy, this means you can perpetually move them on each hit, since the region moves with them. This seems overpowered at first thought, but then again, you can do the same thing to a selected enemy if you shape the region correctly, for up to 4 attacks. It just feels a bit cheap in that you can knock the enemy back any which way without any planning associated with it. If you place it on an ally, it means basically anyone they hit, they can knock back. Again, it's possible to make this work with the region definition, but it feels cheap without it because it doesn't require any planning. Just tell the barbarian to go hit that guy. It seems to lose the sense of being the tactician. 3) Ambush: As a reaction (by the Warlord) when an enemy enters a TF square, you/allies may move half your speed. Does not use allies' reaction. This has no real use when placed on an enemy, since they'll always be in the TF square. If you place the TF on an ally, you get the same effect as if you had placed the region next to the ally, waiting for an enemy to approach them to within melee range. It does require you to figure out which side is their weak side, though, since you can only cover half of the area around them. 4) As part of move, can swap positions in TF area using 10' of movement. This appears to be pointless for both setting the TF on an enemy and on an ally. The advantage of a position swap is being able to move people several squares at once; they can be up to three squares away from each other. ~~~ Most of what you can do when targeting an individual can be done using the region definition. There are a couple things that don't work quite as well going in the other direction. The [i]feel[/i] of how they work when arranged in a region vs targeted on a creature, though, feels more like tactics when in a region, and more like a buff/debuff when targeting a creature. Targeting a region is more difficult in Theater of the Mind settings, but far from impossible. Target a band between your allies and the enemy. Create a strip through the enemy line that gives an exit route. Focus on this area of the hallway, or the region in front of the door. Focus on the area the boss is standing, and the area behind him leading to the cliff. Just adding some mental 'space' seems pretty sufficient. If we can think up more ideas of things we can do with the TF area, though (ie: more cantrip-level gambits), it can help define whether creature-targeting is useful, or whether it detracts from the design concept. I'll try to come up with a few. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls Happy Fun Hour: The Warlord
Top