Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls Happy Fun Hour: The Warlord
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smbakeresq" data-source="post: 7370268" data-attributes="member: 28301"><p>Yes, we are on the same page. This could all be accomplished with a form of BM class. </p><p></p><p>This discussion actually highlights why Paladins are considered very good. Compare the Fighter chassis to the Paladin Chassis(without spells and subclasses) up to level 10, they are close but the fighter is little ahead. After 11 the fighter gets his extra attack, which stacks with action surge, so it pulls further ahead. The base Paladin chassis gets those saving throws and immunities, which is pretty good of course but sometimes you wont get much mileage out of them. The Fighter though gets its base features and they will be used all the time. But then the Paladin gets those spells, which if used only for smiting will be 25d8 of extra radiant damage at level 10, refreshable on a long rest. The base fighter gets nothing like that, but could get close or ahead with a BM and action surge getting thrown in depending on your short rests. With frequent short rests the fighter chassis keeps recharging its abilities get better. If yo don't get those rests or get more long rests the Paladin is better.</p><p></p><p>However, if you add a Warlord on top of the fighter chassis its the same situation as the BM fighter, if you get to keep going in with all your superiority dice to blow its great, if not the power wanes. I get the fighter chassis gets more attacks, but that doesn't balance out what other classes get earlier. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Anyway, we are better off with the BM+ than nothing. I just don't think that a high level Warlord who blows all his abilities should be able to keep up with all high level fighter who blew all his, the high level fighter should still be on his own with more attacks and such.</p><p></p><p>That's why I think Warlord should be built around granting CHR and/or INT bonuses as riders to other attacks, THP granting, bonus movements, etc. Like the BM can with certain maneuvers but more general and more action efficient.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smbakeresq, post: 7370268, member: 28301"] Yes, we are on the same page. This could all be accomplished with a form of BM class. This discussion actually highlights why Paladins are considered very good. Compare the Fighter chassis to the Paladin Chassis(without spells and subclasses) up to level 10, they are close but the fighter is little ahead. After 11 the fighter gets his extra attack, which stacks with action surge, so it pulls further ahead. The base Paladin chassis gets those saving throws and immunities, which is pretty good of course but sometimes you wont get much mileage out of them. The Fighter though gets its base features and they will be used all the time. But then the Paladin gets those spells, which if used only for smiting will be 25d8 of extra radiant damage at level 10, refreshable on a long rest. The base fighter gets nothing like that, but could get close or ahead with a BM and action surge getting thrown in depending on your short rests. With frequent short rests the fighter chassis keeps recharging its abilities get better. If yo don't get those rests or get more long rests the Paladin is better. However, if you add a Warlord on top of the fighter chassis its the same situation as the BM fighter, if you get to keep going in with all your superiority dice to blow its great, if not the power wanes. I get the fighter chassis gets more attacks, but that doesn't balance out what other classes get earlier. Anyway, we are better off with the BM+ than nothing. I just don't think that a high level Warlord who blows all his abilities should be able to keep up with all high level fighter who blew all his, the high level fighter should still be on his own with more attacks and such. That's why I think Warlord should be built around granting CHR and/or INT bonuses as riders to other attacks, THP granting, bonus movements, etc. Like the BM can with certain maneuvers but more general and more action efficient. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls Happy Fun Hour: The Warlord
Top