Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls interview - states that they may be getting off of the 2 AP/year train.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PMárk" data-source="post: 7079089" data-attributes="member: 6804619"><p>I know it's a frequent viewpoint on these boards ( as in "no settings, no metaplot, please"), from certian people, but I disagree. Detailed settings and ongoing metaplot might be more restrictive (not necessarily), but it provides a lot of stuff for making one person interested in the game and setting. </p><p></p><p> WW is recently planning to bring back the metaplot in the new edition of WoD. Before that, when Onyx Path planned the new edition, they wanted to move on the metaplot and setting, from the metaplot-agnostic point of the 20ths. NWoD, with all its glorious sandox-iness were never as successful as CWoD, never got as big a following base and the latter maintained a lot of it even during the times when it was cancelled and only NWoD was runned.</p><p></p><p> Metaplot also provides stuff for ancillary products, like novels, video games, comics, etc. and a lot of people were came to the game from those. How many gamers could we thank to the Baldur's Gate and Icewind Dale Series? To the Dragonlance novels? For the sake of the flying spaghetti monster, to Drizzt??? I know they did a LOT to got me interested in FR, just as Dave Gross' novels did a lot to won me over for Golarion.</p><p></p><p> Sandbox is good and all, but it's not the ultimate saint grail of rpgs. Neither is ongoing story. They just scratch different itches and different people like them differently. </p><p></p><p> And yes, old books are good, I like them too, but no they aren't an ultimate substitute for new content, especially, when supposedly a lot of stuff happened between editions. </p><p></p><p> Also, TSR might overdid the settings and novels, but honestly, it was a much better time to be a D&D fan from my standpoint (although I came into it during the 3e era, but a lot of novels I read and other stuff came from that era, like the aforementioned computer games) because we've got great setting material and novels. Conversely, their recent publishing model just got me increasingly more and more <em>un</em>interested in the game, despite my initial enthusiasm for the system itself. The cancelling of the novel lines was the last drop, until that changes, honestly a new adventure book, or even a hardback Unearthed Arcana won't get my attention.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PMárk, post: 7079089, member: 6804619"] I know it's a frequent viewpoint on these boards ( as in "no settings, no metaplot, please"), from certian people, but I disagree. Detailed settings and ongoing metaplot might be more restrictive (not necessarily), but it provides a lot of stuff for making one person interested in the game and setting. WW is recently planning to bring back the metaplot in the new edition of WoD. Before that, when Onyx Path planned the new edition, they wanted to move on the metaplot and setting, from the metaplot-agnostic point of the 20ths. NWoD, with all its glorious sandox-iness were never as successful as CWoD, never got as big a following base and the latter maintained a lot of it even during the times when it was cancelled and only NWoD was runned. Metaplot also provides stuff for ancillary products, like novels, video games, comics, etc. and a lot of people were came to the game from those. How many gamers could we thank to the Baldur's Gate and Icewind Dale Series? To the Dragonlance novels? For the sake of the flying spaghetti monster, to Drizzt??? I know they did a LOT to got me interested in FR, just as Dave Gross' novels did a lot to won me over for Golarion. Sandbox is good and all, but it's not the ultimate saint grail of rpgs. Neither is ongoing story. They just scratch different itches and different people like them differently. And yes, old books are good, I like them too, but no they aren't an ultimate substitute for new content, especially, when supposedly a lot of stuff happened between editions. Also, TSR might overdid the settings and novels, but honestly, it was a much better time to be a D&D fan from my standpoint (although I came into it during the 3e era, but a lot of novels I read and other stuff came from that era, like the aforementioned computer games) because we've got great setting material and novels. Conversely, their recent publishing model just got me increasingly more and more [I]un[/I]interested in the game, despite my initial enthusiasm for the system itself. The cancelling of the novel lines was the last drop, until that changes, honestly a new adventure book, or even a hardback Unearthed Arcana won't get my attention. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls interview - states that they may be getting off of the 2 AP/year train.
Top