Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls on D&D Psionics: Should Psionic Flavor Be Altered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 7673415" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>Bloat is certainly an issue, but WotC seems to be on top of this. Since August, we've had four new races, 20 new spells, and bunch of unplaytested "use at your own discretion" articles. We are NOT seeing monthly releases nor 4-6 new classes this go around. </p><p></p><p>That said, the answer is not to avoid it altogether either. The PHB options will eventually wear thin; growth will need to happen. The issue WotC is attempting to avoid is not "too much" but "too much, too soon."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But really, that's true of ANY rules expansion. Already, the EEPG gives players races that can fly or live underwater, both things the PHB races cannot do. The Favored Soul is generally considered superior to the Draconic/Chaos sorcerers (even if its not overpowered, its much more versatile). Hell, those who use only the Basic document have hit a wall against those with the full PHB. Every addition, no matter how small, is going to silo the haves from the have-nots. Is the only solution then a iconoclast game that never expands or gains a new option?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>By that logic, the they should have skipped monks, dragonborn, and those other "options" no one played and stuck with just the Basic classes and races. Why waste space on a class like druid only a handful of player's play?</p><p></p><p>Well, because it means something to the player who likes monks, dragonborn, druids, psionics, or artificers. They have just as much right to play what they want as the cleric, elf, wizard, and fighter players. That option should be available to them, and it should be done with as much time and respect as those basic classes and races were. </p><p></p><p>Chasing what is popular and culling option is why Hollywood churning out nostalgic and comic-book based action schlock or why dozens of small mom-and-pop resteraunts can't compete against chains like Applebee's. Not everyone's tastes will be the same. Shouldn't those people have the option of an artificer or a psion, and those who dislike said options be allowed to just say "no classes beyond the PHB" if they want?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 7673415, member: 7635"] Bloat is certainly an issue, but WotC seems to be on top of this. Since August, we've had four new races, 20 new spells, and bunch of unplaytested "use at your own discretion" articles. We are NOT seeing monthly releases nor 4-6 new classes this go around. That said, the answer is not to avoid it altogether either. The PHB options will eventually wear thin; growth will need to happen. The issue WotC is attempting to avoid is not "too much" but "too much, too soon." But really, that's true of ANY rules expansion. Already, the EEPG gives players races that can fly or live underwater, both things the PHB races cannot do. The Favored Soul is generally considered superior to the Draconic/Chaos sorcerers (even if its not overpowered, its much more versatile). Hell, those who use only the Basic document have hit a wall against those with the full PHB. Every addition, no matter how small, is going to silo the haves from the have-nots. Is the only solution then a iconoclast game that never expands or gains a new option? By that logic, the they should have skipped monks, dragonborn, and those other "options" no one played and stuck with just the Basic classes and races. Why waste space on a class like druid only a handful of player's play? Well, because it means something to the player who likes monks, dragonborn, druids, psionics, or artificers. They have just as much right to play what they want as the cleric, elf, wizard, and fighter players. That option should be available to them, and it should be done with as much time and respect as those basic classes and races were. Chasing what is popular and culling option is why Hollywood churning out nostalgic and comic-book based action schlock or why dozens of small mom-and-pop resteraunts can't compete against chains like Applebee's. Not everyone's tastes will be the same. Shouldn't those people have the option of an artificer or a psion, and those who dislike said options be allowed to just say "no classes beyond the PHB" if they want? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls on D&D Psionics: Should Psionic Flavor Be Altered?
Top