Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls on D&D Psionics: Should Psionic Flavor Be Altered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fuindordm" data-source="post: 7673779" data-attributes="member: 5435"><p>No, they're enough, I was just suggesting a little more granularity. For example, if we saw a 9th level spell that would be really appropriate as a psionic power, then we could add it to the table under rank 5 but also add an extra level prerequisite to that power. </p><p></p><p>Alternatively, give each discipline one "Grand Science" that unlocks with 5 ranks, and is usable 1/day above and beyond the normal mental power budget (similar to the Warlock's major arcana). </p><p></p><p>But neither might be necessary, I was just thinking aloud about another design parameter that could be used while balancing the class.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks, I didn't understand that the duration note under "Using Mental Powers" was meant to be a total limit on the use of all powers. I thought it was just the maximum duration that you could sustain any given power, and I was looking for something else in the writeup.</p><p></p><p>So your mental ranks basically increase your known powers (but you have to specialize to keep up with your companions!), and you have Level + Int bonus rounds of mental powers, TOTAL, per day--barring cannibalizing your body. I like the fact that you burn Con and not HP, but we should be wary of Psychic overburn followed by Cleric restoration. (Exhaustion is also a good limiting factor, and maybe it is enough actually without taking Con damage). </p><p></p><p>Overall, the mental ranks + very limited total duration on mental powers doesn't feel quite up to par with a full caster. Maybe like a 2/3 caster? It needs playtesting of course but I feel we could be a little more generous with both, to benchmark well against a wizard or sorcerer at mid levels.</p><p></p><p>It could also be interesting to give them a ki point budget similar to the monk, so that the monk and psion feel mechanically like they're using similar power sources. The monk makes a good benchmark too for judging metabolic powers. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They will, but it might only be a point or two higher. I'd rather they get a more generous benefit, like Advantage on Con checks to maintain concentration (maybe limited to x/short rest, since they already have proficiency). </p><p></p><p>Thanks for putting so much effort into your write-up. It's always easier to debate a concrete proposal than to discuss generalities.</p><p></p><p>Ben</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fuindordm, post: 7673779, member: 5435"] No, they're enough, I was just suggesting a little more granularity. For example, if we saw a 9th level spell that would be really appropriate as a psionic power, then we could add it to the table under rank 5 but also add an extra level prerequisite to that power. Alternatively, give each discipline one "Grand Science" that unlocks with 5 ranks, and is usable 1/day above and beyond the normal mental power budget (similar to the Warlock's major arcana). But neither might be necessary, I was just thinking aloud about another design parameter that could be used while balancing the class. Thanks, I didn't understand that the duration note under "Using Mental Powers" was meant to be a total limit on the use of all powers. I thought it was just the maximum duration that you could sustain any given power, and I was looking for something else in the writeup. So your mental ranks basically increase your known powers (but you have to specialize to keep up with your companions!), and you have Level + Int bonus rounds of mental powers, TOTAL, per day--barring cannibalizing your body. I like the fact that you burn Con and not HP, but we should be wary of Psychic overburn followed by Cleric restoration. (Exhaustion is also a good limiting factor, and maybe it is enough actually without taking Con damage). Overall, the mental ranks + very limited total duration on mental powers doesn't feel quite up to par with a full caster. Maybe like a 2/3 caster? It needs playtesting of course but I feel we could be a little more generous with both, to benchmark well against a wizard or sorcerer at mid levels. It could also be interesting to give them a ki point budget similar to the monk, so that the monk and psion feel mechanically like they're using similar power sources. The monk makes a good benchmark too for judging metabolic powers. They will, but it might only be a point or two higher. I'd rather they get a more generous benefit, like Advantage on Con checks to maintain concentration (maybe limited to x/short rest, since they already have proficiency). Thanks for putting so much effort into your write-up. It's always easier to debate a concrete proposal than to discuss generalities. Ben [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls on D&D Psionics: Should Psionic Flavor Be Altered?
Top