Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls on D&D Psionics: Should Psionic Flavor Be Altered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 7673902" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>I look at like I saw the class debate of the playtest; some people were advocating for subclasses to handle EVERYTHING, including many of the core classes like paladin, bard, ranger, barbarian, and monk. I mean, we had 10/12 classes in their near final form and people on this board were calling for "scrapping the barbarian and make it a background" or "removing the ranger and making it a subclass" level changes. I imagine if WotC had started at a position of "make it a subclass, then branch out" we might have ended up up with 3-4 classes in the PHB and everything else a subclass of them.</p><p></p><p>In fact, that idea WAS tried c.f. the Mage playtest, when the wizard, sorcerer and warlock were all going to share a class and the subclasses determined your caster ability and spells. It was abandoned then due to people wanting those classes to have a unique identity and logistical headaches with three caster systems in one class. We never even got the sorcerer or warlock part to playtest it was so hard to splice systems. I can't imagine its easier now. </p><p></p><p>All of this leads me back to my position; WotC has tried the subclass route (wizardficer) and its tried the alt-casting wizard route (mage) and neither were well received. Trying again seems like waste of resources (and at this point it seems every resource at WotC is critical). We might just get a power-point class that feels like a direct conversion of the 3.5 psion (psicrystals and all), which while not flavorful (basically, a spell-point wizard) at least tries to capture the feel. We might get something more like 2e's psionicist class (incorporating ideas but balancing the system). We might get something totally new (though with 5e's pennant for nostalgia, I doubt so). I'm hoping that WotC is signalling doing psionics "right" and not leaving it a sorcerer sublcass in a UA, but I could be wrong. I was on warlord.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 7673902, member: 7635"] I look at like I saw the class debate of the playtest; some people were advocating for subclasses to handle EVERYTHING, including many of the core classes like paladin, bard, ranger, barbarian, and monk. I mean, we had 10/12 classes in their near final form and people on this board were calling for "scrapping the barbarian and make it a background" or "removing the ranger and making it a subclass" level changes. I imagine if WotC had started at a position of "make it a subclass, then branch out" we might have ended up up with 3-4 classes in the PHB and everything else a subclass of them. In fact, that idea WAS tried c.f. the Mage playtest, when the wizard, sorcerer and warlock were all going to share a class and the subclasses determined your caster ability and spells. It was abandoned then due to people wanting those classes to have a unique identity and logistical headaches with three caster systems in one class. We never even got the sorcerer or warlock part to playtest it was so hard to splice systems. I can't imagine its easier now. All of this leads me back to my position; WotC has tried the subclass route (wizardficer) and its tried the alt-casting wizard route (mage) and neither were well received. Trying again seems like waste of resources (and at this point it seems every resource at WotC is critical). We might just get a power-point class that feels like a direct conversion of the 3.5 psion (psicrystals and all), which while not flavorful (basically, a spell-point wizard) at least tries to capture the feel. We might get something more like 2e's psionicist class (incorporating ideas but balancing the system). We might get something totally new (though with 5e's pennant for nostalgia, I doubt so). I'm hoping that WotC is signalling doing psionics "right" and not leaving it a sorcerer sublcass in a UA, but I could be wrong. I was on warlord. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls on D&D Psionics: Should Psionic Flavor Be Altered?
Top