Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Mike Mearls on how 4E could have looked
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 7523044" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Just a couple things here. Understand that I don't take offense to the above. I just want to make sure you have context for what I write so neither of us waste the other's time with unhelpful responses.</p><p></p><p>1) Gygax's DMG and the redbox were what got me started playing this game. I ran AD&D and BECMI/RC from 1984 through 1999 (so 15 years) to something of the tune of 5000 + hours Gamesmastering. Just an absurd amount of time. Further still, in the years since, I've run plenty of Basic, plenty of Beyond the Wall, plenty of Torchbearer, and some more AD&D for dungeon crawl spurts. </p><p></p><p>As such, I couldn't be more familiar with orthodox hexcrawl and dungeon crawl procedures for content generation, game management, and objective refereeing. So I'm very familiar with the type of granular accounting (spatial units and temporal units) required (which is why I invoked it). I just don't enjoy that mental overhead anymore. You can appreciate the relevance of something without enjoying it (as is the case here).</p><p></p><p>2) You've related a few times about how you feel either scenario or adjudication favored the Diviner. In the particular situation I cited, the home GM of that game (whose rules and procedures I would respectfully abide by when I would stand in for him) runs 30 minute Short Rests (rather than 1 hour or the 5 optional in the DMG). Tongues was cast somewhere in the vicinity of 5ish minutes before the beginning of our session (my best guess as the parlay failed and combat ensued and resolved). They took a Short Rest (so </p><p>30 minutes is a hard number I know). They investigated the Hoverpods, got one working for their efforts, and flew up to the mother ship; perhaps 10 + 2 for flight or 12ish minutes. Air combat was resolved inside of a minute as was the significant combat inside of the ship. Lets just call that 2ish minutes together. The puzzle to get into the ship? That is the most difficult one to account for (and what we haggled over at the table). We're at 49 minutes total right now. Was it 5 minutes? Was it 8 minutes? Was it 11 minutes? Was it 15. I definitely don't think it was the 1st or the last, so somewhere in the middle. I'm not going to belabor over it too long at the table and bring the game to a screeching halt. I'm going to come up with an equittable ruling and move along (even though they disagreed); Tongues through the encounter but no longer.</p><p></p><p>What are you advocating for (procedurally or conversation at the table)?</p><p></p><p>3) This isn't the post I quoted above, but somewhere else you noted that you tried to run D&D 4e in a traditional way and were disappointed. That makes sense because 4e is a game where the locus of play is the conflict-charged scene (like Fate, Cortex+, Dogs in the Vineyard, Blades in the Dark). If you try to run a game that features discrete scenes (and expressly directs you to "go to the action"; "skip the gate guards and get to the fun") as a game of serial (spatially and temporally) exploration, its going to push back against you (and in some places, quite hard). </p><p></p><p>If I transliterated the scenario I conveyed above into 4e, it would be SIGNIFICANTLY different. You <strong>would </strong>have superheroic genre logic. You <strong>would </strong>have Closed-Scene as the exclusive locus of play trajectory. You <strong>wouldn't </strong>have serial accounting for time and space in the way. There <strong>wouldn't </strong>be serial exploration, a keyed map, or Exploration Turns that are pressured by a Wandering Monster/Random Encounter Clock, and there wouldn't be any "win condition" spells. My guess is it would be:</p><p></p><p>Skill Challenge Level + 2 Complexity 1; parley</p><p>Level + 3 Combat (arising from failure above)</p><p>Skill Challenge Level + 0 Complexity 2; to get into the ship (including the air combat at the ship's hull as a nested combat for an accrued Success or Failure)</p><p>Level + 5 Combat</p><p>Skill Challenge Level + 2 Complexity 3; to locate The Time Reaper and disable it </p><p>Skill Challenge Level + 0 Complexity 1; parley with the engineer/commander</p><p>Level + 7 Combat with The Harvester</p><p></p><p>I could throw together a speculative series of action declarations, resolution, and scene evolution that I think may be instructive as to the differences if that would help you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 7523044, member: 6696971"] Just a couple things here. Understand that I don't take offense to the above. I just want to make sure you have context for what I write so neither of us waste the other's time with unhelpful responses. 1) Gygax's DMG and the redbox were what got me started playing this game. I ran AD&D and BECMI/RC from 1984 through 1999 (so 15 years) to something of the tune of 5000 + hours Gamesmastering. Just an absurd amount of time. Further still, in the years since, I've run plenty of Basic, plenty of Beyond the Wall, plenty of Torchbearer, and some more AD&D for dungeon crawl spurts. As such, I couldn't be more familiar with orthodox hexcrawl and dungeon crawl procedures for content generation, game management, and objective refereeing. So I'm very familiar with the type of granular accounting (spatial units and temporal units) required (which is why I invoked it). I just don't enjoy that mental overhead anymore. You can appreciate the relevance of something without enjoying it (as is the case here). 2) You've related a few times about how you feel either scenario or adjudication favored the Diviner. In the particular situation I cited, the home GM of that game (whose rules and procedures I would respectfully abide by when I would stand in for him) runs 30 minute Short Rests (rather than 1 hour or the 5 optional in the DMG). Tongues was cast somewhere in the vicinity of 5ish minutes before the beginning of our session (my best guess as the parlay failed and combat ensued and resolved). They took a Short Rest (so 30 minutes is a hard number I know). They investigated the Hoverpods, got one working for their efforts, and flew up to the mother ship; perhaps 10 + 2 for flight or 12ish minutes. Air combat was resolved inside of a minute as was the significant combat inside of the ship. Lets just call that 2ish minutes together. The puzzle to get into the ship? That is the most difficult one to account for (and what we haggled over at the table). We're at 49 minutes total right now. Was it 5 minutes? Was it 8 minutes? Was it 11 minutes? Was it 15. I definitely don't think it was the 1st or the last, so somewhere in the middle. I'm not going to belabor over it too long at the table and bring the game to a screeching halt. I'm going to come up with an equittable ruling and move along (even though they disagreed); Tongues through the encounter but no longer. What are you advocating for (procedurally or conversation at the table)? 3) This isn't the post I quoted above, but somewhere else you noted that you tried to run D&D 4e in a traditional way and were disappointed. That makes sense because 4e is a game where the locus of play is the conflict-charged scene (like Fate, Cortex+, Dogs in the Vineyard, Blades in the Dark). If you try to run a game that features discrete scenes (and expressly directs you to "go to the action"; "skip the gate guards and get to the fun") as a game of serial (spatially and temporally) exploration, its going to push back against you (and in some places, quite hard). If I transliterated the scenario I conveyed above into 4e, it would be SIGNIFICANTLY different. You [B]would [/B]have superheroic genre logic. You [B]would [/B]have Closed-Scene as the exclusive locus of play trajectory. You [B]wouldn't [/B]have serial accounting for time and space in the way. There [B]wouldn't [/B]be serial exploration, a keyed map, or Exploration Turns that are pressured by a Wandering Monster/Random Encounter Clock, and there wouldn't be any "win condition" spells. My guess is it would be: Skill Challenge Level + 2 Complexity 1; parley Level + 3 Combat (arising from failure above) Skill Challenge Level + 0 Complexity 2; to get into the ship (including the air combat at the ship's hull as a nested combat for an accrued Success or Failure) Level + 5 Combat Skill Challenge Level + 2 Complexity 3; to locate The Time Reaper and disable it Skill Challenge Level + 0 Complexity 1; parley with the engineer/commander Level + 7 Combat with The Harvester I could throw together a speculative series of action declarations, resolution, and scene evolution that I think may be instructive as to the differences if that would help you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Mike Mearls on how 4E could have looked
Top