Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 7525251" data-attributes="member: 48965">Emphasis mine...This is where I feel like these threads break down... you aren't trying to present a question and determine if your assumptions are correct.&nbsp; You're coming in with an assumption you've already concluded is the correct one and infallible.&nbsp; And of course those who already agree with you of course don't question it and support your use of cherry picked evidence and dismissal of anything that contradicts your already decided premise. On top of that those who do not agree and actually make the effort to present evidence that doesn't align with your foregone conclusions are labelled haters and are accused of partaking in edition warring (as opposed to just disagreeing with the group think present with a handful of the 4e community) ... then you claim those who disagree are in fact the ones in an echo chamber, really?&nbsp; Honestly it seems you don't really want a multi-faceted discussion you want acquiescence with what you've already decided is the correct conclusion... or perhaps a passive audience to read over your theories on roleplaying while nodding in total agreement...&nbsp; Don;t get me wrong I find your ideas and thoughts interesting but I'm not going to passively agree with everything you post without questioning and looking at alternate evidence and angles, if you want that well... that's what blogs are for,</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 7525251, member: 48965"] Emphasis mine... This is where I feel like these threads break down... you aren't trying to present a question and determine if your assumptions are correct. You're coming in with an assumption you've already concluded is the correct one and infallible. And of course those who already agree with you of course don't question it and support your use of cherry picked evidence and dismissal of anything that contradicts your already decided premise. On top of that those who do not agree and actually make the effort to present evidence that doesn't align with your foregone conclusions are labelled haters and are accused of partaking in edition warring (as opposed to just disagreeing with the group think present with a handful of the 4e community) ... then you claim those who disagree are in fact the ones in an echo chamber, really? Honestly it seems you don't really want a multi-faceted discussion you want acquiescence with what you've already decided is the correct conclusion... or perhaps a passive audience to read over your theories on roleplaying while nodding in total agreement... Don;t get me wrong I find your ideas and thoughts interesting but I'm not going to passively agree with everything you post without questioning and looking at alternate evidence and angles, if you want that well... that's what blogs are for, [/QUOTE]

Verification