Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Mike Mearls on how 4E could have looked
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 7528159" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>There's a weirdness which bothers me about this sort of thing though, which is this: If you have such awesome accuracy and ability to toss a knife or shoot an arrow, etc. such that you can pin people to walls, hamstring them, etc. then you CERTAINLY have the accuracy to put one through their left eyeball every time! </p><p></p><p>I mean, OK, you can come up with some other explanations for some control effects, smoke arrows, a fusillade of daggers so thick the enemy is temporarily unable to get past it, etc. These rarely really provide the kind of paradigm that will support a whole class worth of 'stuff'. I see this as the main explanation for why there are 'off-role controllers' in Martial, like some rogues, some rangers, etc. It might actually be EASIER to imagine in terms of a melee character, but then you sink back into the swamp of "why is this not just a defender?" </p><p></p><p>TBH I think these are the considerations which lead WotC to never find any attempts at Martial Controller to be really convincing enough to adopt. MANY people pitched the concept to them! Yet they never bit. </p><p></p><p>Obviously I can't credibly contradict anything Mearls has to say about 4e and who, what, why things were the way they were, but IMHO WotC never cared that much about 'grid filling'. Maybe some people there were in favor of it, but I really don't see strong evidence that they were determined to do it, or that it was a big effort. In fact I think most of the 4e devs must have thought it wasn't a particularly strong idea and weren't that interested in it per se. They were certainly WILLING to fill in a 'gridpoint' if it resulted in a good class, but they were equally willing to simply allocate that concept to a more appropriate role/source if there was one, even if there were already a class in that 'slot'. </p><p></p><p>The few times they seem to have actually gone for it were NOT memorable! Who is excited by the Seeker? Ranged Primal Controller, weak concept that proved hard to translate into a good implementation!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 7528159, member: 82106"] There's a weirdness which bothers me about this sort of thing though, which is this: If you have such awesome accuracy and ability to toss a knife or shoot an arrow, etc. such that you can pin people to walls, hamstring them, etc. then you CERTAINLY have the accuracy to put one through their left eyeball every time! I mean, OK, you can come up with some other explanations for some control effects, smoke arrows, a fusillade of daggers so thick the enemy is temporarily unable to get past it, etc. These rarely really provide the kind of paradigm that will support a whole class worth of 'stuff'. I see this as the main explanation for why there are 'off-role controllers' in Martial, like some rogues, some rangers, etc. It might actually be EASIER to imagine in terms of a melee character, but then you sink back into the swamp of "why is this not just a defender?" TBH I think these are the considerations which lead WotC to never find any attempts at Martial Controller to be really convincing enough to adopt. MANY people pitched the concept to them! Yet they never bit. Obviously I can't credibly contradict anything Mearls has to say about 4e and who, what, why things were the way they were, but IMHO WotC never cared that much about 'grid filling'. Maybe some people there were in favor of it, but I really don't see strong evidence that they were determined to do it, or that it was a big effort. In fact I think most of the 4e devs must have thought it wasn't a particularly strong idea and weren't that interested in it per se. They were certainly WILLING to fill in a 'gridpoint' if it resulted in a good class, but they were equally willing to simply allocate that concept to a more appropriate role/source if there was one, even if there were already a class in that 'slot'. The few times they seem to have actually gone for it were NOT memorable! Who is excited by the Seeker? Ranged Primal Controller, weak concept that proved hard to translate into a good implementation! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Mike Mearls on how 4E could have looked
Top