Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 9791389" data-attributes="member: 63508">It's mostly a money problem. D&amp;D doesn't get the grace of the games get where people would allow for it to edit balance and errata issues that come up because of missed gaps in play testing.NORIs D&amp;D ever allowed to go through enough play testing for the amount of times and tests needed to create the base structure that you would build off of without going years of poor profit and poor sales due to it openly advertising a new addition. Most other games can simply go into the new edition and fix problems while keeping some of the same base mostly because by the time they do so they have little real sales of their old edition to lose. The old game is dead so as long as they have the funding for the development phase they can go 2-4 years in testing.D&amp;D only had that luxury one time when Wizards had initially bought it and were redesigning their system because it was dead.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 9791389, member: 63508"] It's mostly a money problem. D&D doesn't get the grace of the games get where people would allow for it to edit balance and errata issues that come up because of missed gaps in play testing. NOR Is D&D ever allowed to go through enough play testing for the amount of times and tests needed to create the base structure that you would build off of without going years of poor profit and poor sales due to it openly advertising a new addition. Most other games can simply go into the new edition and fix problems while keeping some of the same base mostly because by the time they do so they have little real sales of their old edition to lose. The old game is dead so as long as they have the funding for the development phase they can go 2-4 years in testing. D&D only had that luxury one time when Wizards had initially bought it and were redesigning their system because it was dead. [/QUOTE]

Verification