Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 9793788" data-attributes="member: 63508"><p>The baseline difficulty is for new players and bad players.</p><p></p><p>My point was that if you build a character and run a character making mistakes like a new player would you can still reliably beat the stuff in the monster manual. If you actually build or play <strong>well,</strong> you <strong>destroy</strong> those monsters.</p><p></p><p>That's the whole point of this thread. </p><p>If you actually cast a control spell versus one of the saving throws of a boss monster the boss monster is absolutely screwed. That's why 5e kludge it via legendary resistance.</p><p></p><p>Because the monster is screwed if you don't "cheat" for them </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> I'm saying this same thing I always said. </p><p></p><p>I said that my belief based on what I've heard in interviews and articles was that 5e was designed with open space so that DMs and third party publishers could design modules which can be slotted into that open space to provide different kinds of feels.</p><p></p><p>It was designed so a bunch of 4th edition fans who did not think 5e was tactical and cinematic enough, could buy a book by Monkey Book Publishing and inject those rules into 5th edition.</p><p></p><p>That's the purposeful design into 5e's completely.</p><p></p><p>On the new player front, 5e's monsters were designed to be relatively easy to defeat. This is because it use an attrition model heavily preferred by old school gamers where individual monsters were not strong but you would use many of them to slowly wear down resources. The main difference is unlike in Old School D&D, they made the monsters also much weaker than the PCs. So even PCs with suboptimal choices are very strong against those monsters.</p><p></p><p>Remember in original 2014 5th edition feat and multiclassing were both optional. If you actually allowed feats and multiclassing and you actually did it well your character strength increased <strong>dramatically</strong>. For spellcasters you didn't even need the optional rules you <em>just needed</em> to <strong>pick the good spells</strong> and have their slot available.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 9793788, member: 63508"] The baseline difficulty is for new players and bad players. My point was that if you build a character and run a character making mistakes like a new player would you can still reliably beat the stuff in the monster manual. If you actually build or play [B]well,[/B] you [B]destroy[/B] those monsters. That's the whole point of this thread. If you actually cast a control spell versus one of the saving throws of a boss monster the boss monster is absolutely screwed. That's why 5e kludge it via legendary resistance. Because the monster is screwed if you don't "cheat" for them I'm saying this same thing I always said. I said that my belief based on what I've heard in interviews and articles was that 5e was designed with open space so that DMs and third party publishers could design modules which can be slotted into that open space to provide different kinds of feels. It was designed so a bunch of 4th edition fans who did not think 5e was tactical and cinematic enough, could buy a book by Monkey Book Publishing and inject those rules into 5th edition. That's the purposeful design into 5e's completely. On the new player front, 5e's monsters were designed to be relatively easy to defeat. This is because it use an attrition model heavily preferred by old school gamers where individual monsters were not strong but you would use many of them to slowly wear down resources. The main difference is unlike in Old School D&D, they made the monsters also much weaker than the PCs. So even PCs with suboptimal choices are very strong against those monsters. Remember in original 2014 5th edition feat and multiclassing were both optional. If you actually allowed feats and multiclassing and you actually did it well your character strength increased [B]dramatically[/B]. For spellcasters you didn't even need the optional rules you [I]just needed[/I] to [B]pick the good spells[/B] and have their slot available. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition
Top