Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mind Blank against Command
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 8400142" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>Let's just state the obvious and keep it in mind: They didn't settle upon the best wording here. They had an intent, they tried to reduce it to words, but their words did not achieve their goals. </p><p></p><p>If they wanted all enchantment spells to be blocked by Mind Blank, it would have been easy to put that in place. They did not. </p><p></p><p>Further, when we read the second sentence, we can consider it in one of two ways. Either the "affect the target's mind" can be seen as broadening the list from the first sentence to all mind influencing magic, or it could be a way to summarize the items from the first sentence that affect minds, despite not having the specificity of that first sentence's list. It could either be saying, "Hey, no enchantments at all!" or it could be saying, "You can't charm, even if you use a wish to do it!" Honestly, neither option is well served by the way the spell is written.</p><p></p><p>In the end, I take the WOPR approach - "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play."</p><p></p><p>While Mind Blank, as written exists in my campaign, so does a variant that specifies that any spell that influences or controls the actions, behaviors or thoughts of the target is blocked. Guess which one is found more often.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 8400142, member: 2629"] Let's just state the obvious and keep it in mind: They didn't settle upon the best wording here. They had an intent, they tried to reduce it to words, but their words did not achieve their goals. If they wanted all enchantment spells to be blocked by Mind Blank, it would have been easy to put that in place. They did not. Further, when we read the second sentence, we can consider it in one of two ways. Either the "affect the target's mind" can be seen as broadening the list from the first sentence to all mind influencing magic, or it could be a way to summarize the items from the first sentence that affect minds, despite not having the specificity of that first sentence's list. It could either be saying, "Hey, no enchantments at all!" or it could be saying, "You can't charm, even if you use a wish to do it!" Honestly, neither option is well served by the way the spell is written. In the end, I take the WOPR approach - "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play." While Mind Blank, as written exists in my campaign, so does a variant that specifies that any spell that influences or controls the actions, behaviors or thoughts of the target is blocked. Guess which one is found more often. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mind Blank against Command
Top