Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mind Blank and Telepathic Bond = The Uninformed Barbarian?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aesmael" data-source="post: 2035388" data-attributes="member: 22503"><p>In the first sentence of the spell description. The one that tells people what they can expect from the spell, before said description goes into the specifics.</p><p></p><p></p><p>People like the designers, you mean?</p><p></p><p></p><p>In fact, if you carefully read my post, you will see that I note scrying as being mentioned seperately. This is because scrying does not detect, influence or read thoughts. However, Mind Blank does protect against it, and it therefore must also be mentioned in the description.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not so. Scrying effects are mentioned in the second of two 'additional' effects.</p><p></p><p>Description goes: Protects thoughts and emotions from being read, detected or influenced. Clarified as protection from spells that are 'mind-affecting' as well as those divination spells and effects which gather information. (note that the second sentence is indeed unclear wert divination - the first sentence is actually more clear, referring specifically to 'reading' and 'detecting' thoughts [influencing is, as I pointed out earlier, covered by the block on mind-affecting spells] as opposed to 'information gathering' [which, unlike those two terms, is not used elsewhere); when checking to see if a divination spell is blocked by mind blank refer to the spell in question to find out if it reads or detects thoughts, those are the ones blocked).</p><p></p><p>The description then goes on to clarify that, yes, even limited wish, miracle and wish are foiled when used to . 'It' could indeed be taken as referring to the subject, but more likely means the exact article mentioned already in the sentence, that being the 'subject's <em>mind</em>'.</p><p></p><p>The description then goes on to describe the additional case of mind blank's interactions with scrying effects. Specifically, it also prevents the subject from being seen by any scrying effects, even though those effects do not provide information about the subject's state of mind or emotions (nor allow them to be influenced), except by inference. That is an extra effect of mind blank.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, it does do more. It also protects against scrying. But that <em>is</em> the limit of its powers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aesmael, post: 2035388, member: 22503"] In the first sentence of the spell description. The one that tells people what they can expect from the spell, before said description goes into the specifics. People like the designers, you mean? In fact, if you carefully read my post, you will see that I note scrying as being mentioned seperately. This is because scrying does not detect, influence or read thoughts. However, Mind Blank does protect against it, and it therefore must also be mentioned in the description. Not so. Scrying effects are mentioned in the second of two 'additional' effects. Description goes: Protects thoughts and emotions from being read, detected or influenced. Clarified as protection from spells that are 'mind-affecting' as well as those divination spells and effects which gather information. (note that the second sentence is indeed unclear wert divination - the first sentence is actually more clear, referring specifically to 'reading' and 'detecting' thoughts [influencing is, as I pointed out earlier, covered by the block on mind-affecting spells] as opposed to 'information gathering' [which, unlike those two terms, is not used elsewhere); when checking to see if a divination spell is blocked by mind blank refer to the spell in question to find out if it reads or detects thoughts, those are the ones blocked). The description then goes on to clarify that, yes, even limited wish, miracle and wish are foiled when used to . 'It' could indeed be taken as referring to the subject, but more likely means the exact article mentioned already in the sentence, that being the 'subject's [I]mind[/I]'. The description then goes on to describe the additional case of mind blank's interactions with scrying effects. Specifically, it also prevents the subject from being seen by any scrying effects, even though those effects do not provide information about the subject's state of mind or emotions (nor allow them to be influenced), except by inference. That is an extra effect of mind blank. Actually, it does do more. It also protects against scrying. But that [I]is[/I] the limit of its powers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mind Blank and Telepathic Bond = The Uninformed Barbarian?
Top