Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
MInd Blank vs. True Strike, part II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 64847" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>The problem with the Sage's rulings are two fold in general:</p><p></p><p>1) He tends to look at a single sentence in a book and make a ruling on it, even though there are other sentences in the books which might have bearing on the subject. He seems to be very literal with regard to the rules and very focussed on single instances of a given rule.</p><p></p><p>2) If you want to make sure he makes a good ruling, you cannot just ask him a simple question because he might not realize the points of contention that sparked the question. A better way to ask him is to say "Mind Blank states ..., True Strike is a divination spell that states..., so does this clause in MB prevent TS from targetting an MB protected character?". Just asking him if MB stops TS does not ensure that he even reads the spells.</p><p></p><p>This is one of the reasons he changes his rulings on occassion. People do not give him enough information and expect him to pull out the books and read several different sections on his own. I really doubt he has time to do that every time. If you ask him questions like these without giving him details, expect his answer to possibly change in the future.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 64847, member: 2011"] The problem with the Sage's rulings are two fold in general: 1) He tends to look at a single sentence in a book and make a ruling on it, even though there are other sentences in the books which might have bearing on the subject. He seems to be very literal with regard to the rules and very focussed on single instances of a given rule. 2) If you want to make sure he makes a good ruling, you cannot just ask him a simple question because he might not realize the points of contention that sparked the question. A better way to ask him is to say "Mind Blank states ..., True Strike is a divination spell that states..., so does this clause in MB prevent TS from targetting an MB protected character?". Just asking him if MB stops TS does not ensure that he even reads the spells. This is one of the reasons he changes his rulings on occassion. People do not give him enough information and expect him to pull out the books and read several different sections on his own. I really doubt he has time to do that every time. If you ask him questions like these without giving him details, expect his answer to possibly change in the future. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
MInd Blank vs. True Strike, part II
Top