Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Minions and hps
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4481674" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>You are missing the point completely.</p><p></p><p>The minion rules are bad from the player's POV, not the DM's.</p><p></p><p>It is BORING to drop a Cloud of Daggers on a minion:</p><p></p><p>DM: "What are you doing?"</p><p>Player: "Well, I drop a Cloud of Daggers on the minion flanking the Fighter because I <strong>know</strong> it will kill it."</p><p></p><p>Yawn. As opposed to doing some other action. The PC does not know it will kill the minion, the player does.</p><p></p><p>This is also similar to 3.5 Clerical healing. The 3.5 Cleric was expected to use up a standard action to heal, so he did. The 4E Wizard is expected to use up a standard action to auto-kill, so he does.</p><p></p><p>That's not fun. The reason it is not fun is because it is not a challenge.</p><p></p><p>The minion rules allow for auto-kill with certain powers and auto-kill is boring.</p><p></p><p>The fact that minions are paper tigers is bad enough (that too is boring for some players, like cats, some players like to toy with their enemies, not have them fall over when the PC sneezes). The fact that some powers auto-kill minions makes it worse.</p><p></p><p>And, the convenience for the DM outweighs the fun of the players. The implementation of the minion rules are all about DM convenience, not about monster obstacles. Sure, they are monster obstacles, but that is not why they have one hit point. The main reason they have one hit point is so that the DM can more easily use them (they had more hit points in early 4E design and it was changed to one for DM convenience).</p><p></p><p>Sorry, but that's lame. That makes for an inferior game mechanic when the DM convenience rules force certain player game decisions.</p><p></p><p>And, a PC using attacks that do half damage on a miss do NO damage to a minion. That too is a lame rule (added on top of the first lame rule, a snowball effect). The player went out of his way to use up a powerful attack that is sure to damage, except because of the inferior minion rules, it doesn't. If you consider that FUN for the player, you have a strange idea of fun.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line: The concept of minions is great. It's great to have fodder enemies. The implementation sucks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4481674, member: 2011"] You are missing the point completely. The minion rules are bad from the player's POV, not the DM's. It is BORING to drop a Cloud of Daggers on a minion: DM: "What are you doing?" Player: "Well, I drop a Cloud of Daggers on the minion flanking the Fighter because I [b]know[/b] it will kill it." Yawn. As opposed to doing some other action. The PC does not know it will kill the minion, the player does. This is also similar to 3.5 Clerical healing. The 3.5 Cleric was expected to use up a standard action to heal, so he did. The 4E Wizard is expected to use up a standard action to auto-kill, so he does. That's not fun. The reason it is not fun is because it is not a challenge. The minion rules allow for auto-kill with certain powers and auto-kill is boring. The fact that minions are paper tigers is bad enough (that too is boring for some players, like cats, some players like to toy with their enemies, not have them fall over when the PC sneezes). The fact that some powers auto-kill minions makes it worse. And, the convenience for the DM outweighs the fun of the players. The implementation of the minion rules are all about DM convenience, not about monster obstacles. Sure, they are monster obstacles, but that is not why they have one hit point. The main reason they have one hit point is so that the DM can more easily use them (they had more hit points in early 4E design and it was changed to one for DM convenience). Sorry, but that's lame. That makes for an inferior game mechanic when the DM convenience rules force certain player game decisions. And, a PC using attacks that do half damage on a miss do NO damage to a minion. That too is a lame rule (added on top of the first lame rule, a snowball effect). The player went out of his way to use up a powerful attack that is sure to damage, except because of the inferior minion rules, it doesn't. If you consider that FUN for the player, you have a strange idea of fun. Bottom line: The concept of minions is great. It's great to have fodder enemies. The implementation sucks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Minions and hps
Top