Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
minis and battlemats or not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dykstrav" data-source="post: 4862529" data-attributes="member: 40522"><p>I started using minis and battle mats in the mid-2E days. Most of my players loved the idea, but in the days of pewter, only about four or five players actually bought and painted minis.</p><p></p><p>A 1E DM that I played under in the same time frame hated minis and mats. He claimed it interfered with immersion, but after trying it twice, the players all pretty much realized that it took away his ability to fudge positioning when he wanted. We respected his decision to abstract positioning and left the mats and minis for my 2E game.</p><p></p><p>In 2002, I tried going back to 2E and had a blast with everything except combat. The DM was good at the storytelling and narrative angle but felt restricted by the rules, and the combat rules were heavily house-ruled (i.e., he often ignored the rules as written in favor of what he wanted to happen, sometimes in our favor and sometimes in the monster's favor). This guy was heavily abstract, he even told us that he kept hit points secret because he felt like player's tracking hit points was metagaming (which, I fould out later, he fudged as he liked as well).</p><p></p><p>In the early 3E days, many of the DMs I saw didn't like mats and miniatures because they didn't like attacks of opportunity or the way flanking and the rogue's sneak attack worked. They decided to play without mats and minis as a method to maintain more control over combat. Typically, this had the net effect of reducing sneak attacks and attacks of opportunity to either encounter powers or relegating them to DM fiat.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I prefer miniatures and some sort of battle mat. Currently, I'm using maps from the fantastic locations products and dungeon tiles, but I've spent many a year on the vinyl. I feel that it makes the game more into a board game, but you also gain the benefit of consistently applied rules. Players aren't asking about positioning every turn when their iniative comes up, so it speeds up play. The world (and when characters can use their cool powers, like sneak attack) doesn't feel so random when everyone can clearly see where their character is on a board.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dykstrav, post: 4862529, member: 40522"] I started using minis and battle mats in the mid-2E days. Most of my players loved the idea, but in the days of pewter, only about four or five players actually bought and painted minis. A 1E DM that I played under in the same time frame hated minis and mats. He claimed it interfered with immersion, but after trying it twice, the players all pretty much realized that it took away his ability to fudge positioning when he wanted. We respected his decision to abstract positioning and left the mats and minis for my 2E game. In 2002, I tried going back to 2E and had a blast with everything except combat. The DM was good at the storytelling and narrative angle but felt restricted by the rules, and the combat rules were heavily house-ruled (i.e., he often ignored the rules as written in favor of what he wanted to happen, sometimes in our favor and sometimes in the monster's favor). This guy was heavily abstract, he even told us that he kept hit points secret because he felt like player's tracking hit points was metagaming (which, I fould out later, he fudged as he liked as well). In the early 3E days, many of the DMs I saw didn't like mats and miniatures because they didn't like attacks of opportunity or the way flanking and the rogue's sneak attack worked. They decided to play without mats and minis as a method to maintain more control over combat. Typically, this had the net effect of reducing sneak attacks and attacks of opportunity to either encounter powers or relegating them to DM fiat. Personally, I prefer miniatures and some sort of battle mat. Currently, I'm using maps from the fantastic locations products and dungeon tiles, but I've spent many a year on the vinyl. I feel that it makes the game more into a board game, but you also gain the benefit of consistently applied rules. Players aren't asking about positioning every turn when their iniative comes up, so it speeds up play. The world (and when characters can use their cool powers, like sneak attack) doesn't feel so random when everyone can clearly see where their character is on a board. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
minis and battlemats or not?
Top