Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Minis and Grids, do you use them?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 2427444" data-attributes="member: 17296"><p>It's more that 3.X is designed as a miniatures game. So many rules and feats and skills (and therefore PrC's) require the mat. </p><p></p><p>I like the basic mat free game style. But you can't really play that in 3.X and use the 3.X rules effectively. The game assumes you're using a mat/grid/etc. And if you play without it the game system doesn't mesh with all the rules. Like in my comment above... I played with a (3rd level) character who had +3 mod to dex and combat reflexes in a recent mat free game... Other characters (I was the newbie in this group) picked things like rapid shot/flurry/two weapon fighting. We got into a mass melee, basically a low level army with opponents everywhere. I only got one attack per round, they all got two. But I had the 'potential' for four attacks per round. In a melee with everyone moving around/etc (as was described) I definitely should have gotten more. </p><p></p><p>Was this the GM's fault or the playstyle's fault? In part... I don't think anyone in his games had ever taken combat reflexes (why should they? It's useless!) I don't think he looked at it. I'm sure he would have done something to take it into account if I'd brought it up, but I didn't know how. In fact, there were a couple of battles that my character sat out completely and just watched, because he wasn't sure what was happening, or that he was supposed to be involved... I imagine if I keep playing with them I'll bring up the CR issue (I took it because it's a prerequisite of a PrC I wanted in), and I'm sure there will be a reasonable ruling. </p><p></p><p>But without a battlemap what could that ruling be? A simple +1 attack per round? I've got +3 to dex so that's quite concevable as an average... But wouldn't they sometimes use tactics to get around that? But wouldn't I use countertactics? On a map, yes. Completely in the air? Impossible to really determine. I can't see really taking that feat in that style of game.</p><p></p><p>And that's just one example. I'm positive there are many others (I can already think of more than it's worth the effort to type in)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ARandomGod, post: 2427444, member: 17296"] It's more that 3.X is designed as a miniatures game. So many rules and feats and skills (and therefore PrC's) require the mat. I like the basic mat free game style. But you can't really play that in 3.X and use the 3.X rules effectively. The game assumes you're using a mat/grid/etc. And if you play without it the game system doesn't mesh with all the rules. Like in my comment above... I played with a (3rd level) character who had +3 mod to dex and combat reflexes in a recent mat free game... Other characters (I was the newbie in this group) picked things like rapid shot/flurry/two weapon fighting. We got into a mass melee, basically a low level army with opponents everywhere. I only got one attack per round, they all got two. But I had the 'potential' for four attacks per round. In a melee with everyone moving around/etc (as was described) I definitely should have gotten more. Was this the GM's fault or the playstyle's fault? In part... I don't think anyone in his games had ever taken combat reflexes (why should they? It's useless!) I don't think he looked at it. I'm sure he would have done something to take it into account if I'd brought it up, but I didn't know how. In fact, there were a couple of battles that my character sat out completely and just watched, because he wasn't sure what was happening, or that he was supposed to be involved... I imagine if I keep playing with them I'll bring up the CR issue (I took it because it's a prerequisite of a PrC I wanted in), and I'm sure there will be a reasonable ruling. But without a battlemap what could that ruling be? A simple +1 attack per round? I've got +3 to dex so that's quite concevable as an average... But wouldn't they sometimes use tactics to get around that? But wouldn't I use countertactics? On a map, yes. Completely in the air? Impossible to really determine. I can't see really taking that feat in that style of game. And that's just one example. I'm positive there are many others (I can already think of more than it's worth the effort to type in) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Minis and Grids, do you use them?
Top