Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
MIrror Image/Illusion question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Murrdox" data-source="post: 1251182" data-attributes="member: 10131"><p>Yup. If you have 5 images in front of you... if you want to hit the wizard, and don't care whether or not you hit the images, just close your eyes. Instead of a 80% miss chance (4 out of 5 chance you hit an image), you now have a 50% miss chance, with no chance to hit the images, since once your eyes are closed, you aren't subject to the effects of the illusion.</p><p></p><p>Also, Hyper, when you talk of the Sage's "suggestion", are you talking about the suggestion that all the images of the Mirror Image always reside in the same square as the caster?</p><p></p><p>This is how we play Mirror Image, because the text of the spell (especially the wording in 3.5) implies that is how it is supposed to be done.</p><p></p><p>Also, the spell gives no information on where the images end up if they DON'T end up in the same square as the caster. Does the DM get to decide how the images arrange themselves? The caster? If the caster, what kind of an action is it for him to tell his images where to place themselves? If the images are spread out, and all the images are hit by a fireball, but the caster is not, suddenly everyone knows who the wizard is, since the images won't react as if being hit by the fireball, since the wizard wasn't.</p><p></p><p>For all these reasons and more, we simply assume that while the images may streak behind the caster as he moves, or lurch in front of him, and swirl around, they always stay within his square while the wizard is taking an action. Otherwise you just run into too many wacky rule situations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Murrdox, post: 1251182, member: 10131"] Yup. If you have 5 images in front of you... if you want to hit the wizard, and don't care whether or not you hit the images, just close your eyes. Instead of a 80% miss chance (4 out of 5 chance you hit an image), you now have a 50% miss chance, with no chance to hit the images, since once your eyes are closed, you aren't subject to the effects of the illusion. Also, Hyper, when you talk of the Sage's "suggestion", are you talking about the suggestion that all the images of the Mirror Image always reside in the same square as the caster? This is how we play Mirror Image, because the text of the spell (especially the wording in 3.5) implies that is how it is supposed to be done. Also, the spell gives no information on where the images end up if they DON'T end up in the same square as the caster. Does the DM get to decide how the images arrange themselves? The caster? If the caster, what kind of an action is it for him to tell his images where to place themselves? If the images are spread out, and all the images are hit by a fireball, but the caster is not, suddenly everyone knows who the wizard is, since the images won't react as if being hit by the fireball, since the wizard wasn't. For all these reasons and more, we simply assume that while the images may streak behind the caster as he moves, or lurch in front of him, and swirl around, they always stay within his square while the wizard is taking an action. Otherwise you just run into too many wacky rule situations. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
MIrror Image/Illusion question
Top