Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mirror Image vs. Cleave
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coredump" data-source="post: 2680915" data-attributes="member: 6939"><p>That is the theory... sort of... but that is not what happened. This is in no way a 'clarification', it is a 'change'. And they don't even label it as a change, they seem to treat it as if that is what the rules say, and they are simply clarifying. They give no indication that they are even aware that it is a change.</p><p>Does this mean that *just* Mirror images are affected? What about other illusions? Can you now cleave off of objects? Are mirror images now treated like creatures? Can you polymorph them?</p><p>They don't get into *why* they ruled, which indicates to me that they don't realize they have made a change....</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sigg, it is interesting to me that you have gone through a whole list of reasons, and they keep get shot down, and then you come up with another reason..... If you are willing to except the rule 'clarifications' from the FAQ, even when they are rules 'changes', that is fine. But you are really grasping at straws for much of your positions at this point.</p><p></p><p>And I would like to highlight what Hyp has said.</p><p></p><p>Feats tell you what you can do, you can only do what they say.</p><p>Cleave says you can get a benefit from attacking a creature.</p><p>It does not say you can get a benefit from attacking an object.</p><p>It does not say you can get a benefit from yelling very loud.</p><p>It does not say you can get a benefit from using an axe.</p><p></p><p>So you are saying "Since it doesn't say I *can't* benefit from attacking an object, that means I *can* benefit from attacking an object.</p><p>Now the player next to you. ""Since it doesn't say I *can't* benefit from yelling very loud, that means I *can* benefit from yelling very loud.</p><p>Then the next player "Since it doesn't say I *can't* benefit from using an axe, that means I *can* benefit from using an axe.</p><p></p><p>Do you see the logic flaw? Feats say you can do extra things, just because a feat doesn't say you can't fly, doesn't mean you can fly.</p><p></p><p>And if the rules state that all creatures must have a wisdom and charisma score, how can you argue that they don't need one? And if you agree with this rule, what wisdom and charisma score do the figments have?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coredump, post: 2680915, member: 6939"] That is the theory... sort of... but that is not what happened. This is in no way a 'clarification', it is a 'change'. And they don't even label it as a change, they seem to treat it as if that is what the rules say, and they are simply clarifying. They give no indication that they are even aware that it is a change. Does this mean that *just* Mirror images are affected? What about other illusions? Can you now cleave off of objects? Are mirror images now treated like creatures? Can you polymorph them? They don't get into *why* they ruled, which indicates to me that they don't realize they have made a change.... Sigg, it is interesting to me that you have gone through a whole list of reasons, and they keep get shot down, and then you come up with another reason..... If you are willing to except the rule 'clarifications' from the FAQ, even when they are rules 'changes', that is fine. But you are really grasping at straws for much of your positions at this point. And I would like to highlight what Hyp has said. Feats tell you what you can do, you can only do what they say. Cleave says you can get a benefit from attacking a creature. It does not say you can get a benefit from attacking an object. It does not say you can get a benefit from yelling very loud. It does not say you can get a benefit from using an axe. So you are saying "Since it doesn't say I *can't* benefit from attacking an object, that means I *can* benefit from attacking an object. Now the player next to you. ""Since it doesn't say I *can't* benefit from yelling very loud, that means I *can* benefit from yelling very loud. Then the next player "Since it doesn't say I *can't* benefit from using an axe, that means I *can* benefit from using an axe. Do you see the logic flaw? Feats say you can do extra things, just because a feat doesn't say you can't fly, doesn't mean you can fly. And if the rules state that all creatures must have a wisdom and charisma score, how can you argue that they don't need one? And if you agree with this rule, what wisdom and charisma score do the figments have? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mirror Image vs. Cleave
Top