Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mirror Image vs. Hold Person (and other non-targeting attacks)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7324146" data-attributes="member: 6919838"><p>EDIT - And simultaneous posting strikes again!!! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /></p><p></p><p>Blue - Consider the case of the duplicate illusion created by Cleric Trickery Duplicity. if one cast a hold person while seeing the illusion duplicate and the actual subject was unseen what would you rule the result to be then? What if Both the duplicate and the original were seen but 15' apart with no clear idea which was the real one? Would you have the hold person "auto-find" the "real boy" each time or attempt to affect the illusion and fail or make the caster choose which one to go after?</p><p></p><p>What if instead of illusion duplicates it was two characters, one looking like the other and the caster needed to catch one of them but did not know visually which was the right one? In that case, they would have to pick a target (based off best info and/or skill info) and hoe they got the right one, right?</p><p></p><p>What if hold person were being cast at a non-humanoid that looked like a humanoid by illusion?</p><p></p><p>The key part, I BELIEVE, of the counter-argument is that "Choose a humanoid..." is a fallible stage and that having multiple identical images creates the exact same (or extremely close) circumstances as any of the above cases and that there is NOTHING in the Mirror image spell text that removes the "Choose a humanoid" requirement from Hold Person.</p><p></p><p>I BELIEVE to that point of view (and a nod to RAW) its **obvious** by Mirror Image what happens when targeted by an attack, but that there is nothing in Mirror Image that makes the impact of "illusory duplicates" of your enemies play any differently for Hold person v Mirror image than it would for Hold Person v Invoke Duplicity or any number of other ways one can have Illusory duplicates - and so they should be handled the same - be it auto-find the desired target.</p><p></p><p>Basically if you have multiple targets which all appear to be "the humanoid you want" and you are required to "Choose a humanoid that you can see within range" does a Gm resolve that **choice** the same or differently based on how the illusions are created, what they really are etc.</p><p></p><p><strong>personally, i believe the RAI matches what you see... that mirror image is intended to only be applied at all against targeted spells and that "Choose a humanoid that you can see within range" gets close enough to work when choosing the ""covey of mages" from Mirror image. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p></p><p>But i can see a (solid) RAW argument just based off the write-up of the mirror image and hold person that could see the other way as equally valid as it <strong>focuses on the restriction in hold person</strong> "Choose a humanoid..." as the key requirement still needing to be made given that in other cases where there are illusory duplicates or indistinguishable foes the "Choose a humanoid..." would become a noticeable and significant problem. </p><p></p><p>i would not myself be surprised if there was not a sage question already answered about this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7324146, member: 6919838"] EDIT - And simultaneous posting strikes again!!! :-) Blue - Consider the case of the duplicate illusion created by Cleric Trickery Duplicity. if one cast a hold person while seeing the illusion duplicate and the actual subject was unseen what would you rule the result to be then? What if Both the duplicate and the original were seen but 15' apart with no clear idea which was the real one? Would you have the hold person "auto-find" the "real boy" each time or attempt to affect the illusion and fail or make the caster choose which one to go after? What if instead of illusion duplicates it was two characters, one looking like the other and the caster needed to catch one of them but did not know visually which was the right one? In that case, they would have to pick a target (based off best info and/or skill info) and hoe they got the right one, right? What if hold person were being cast at a non-humanoid that looked like a humanoid by illusion? The key part, I BELIEVE, of the counter-argument is that "Choose a humanoid..." is a fallible stage and that having multiple identical images creates the exact same (or extremely close) circumstances as any of the above cases and that there is NOTHING in the Mirror image spell text that removes the "Choose a humanoid" requirement from Hold Person. I BELIEVE to that point of view (and a nod to RAW) its **obvious** by Mirror Image what happens when targeted by an attack, but that there is nothing in Mirror Image that makes the impact of "illusory duplicates" of your enemies play any differently for Hold person v Mirror image than it would for Hold Person v Invoke Duplicity or any number of other ways one can have Illusory duplicates - and so they should be handled the same - be it auto-find the desired target. Basically if you have multiple targets which all appear to be "the humanoid you want" and you are required to "Choose a humanoid that you can see within range" does a Gm resolve that **choice** the same or differently based on how the illusions are created, what they really are etc. [B]personally, i believe the RAI matches what you see... that mirror image is intended to only be applied at all against targeted spells and that "Choose a humanoid that you can see within range" gets close enough to work when choosing the ""covey of mages" from Mirror image. [/B] But i can see a (solid) RAW argument just based off the write-up of the mirror image and hold person that could see the other way as equally valid as it [B]focuses on the restriction in hold person[/B] "Choose a humanoid..." as the key requirement still needing to be made given that in other cases where there are illusory duplicates or indistinguishable foes the "Choose a humanoid..." would become a noticeable and significant problem. i would not myself be surprised if there was not a sage question already answered about this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mirror Image vs. Hold Person (and other non-targeting attacks)
Top