Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mirror Image
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 970734" data-attributes="member: 1656"><p>My personal opinion is that if you target a rock with a Magic Missile, then you lose the spell slot and nothing else happens. If you split your three missiles across a rock, a goblin, and an orc standing behind a Wall of Force, then the missile aimed at the rock fails to target (invalid target), the missile aimed at the orc fails to target (no Line of Effect to target), and so a single missile appears and unerringly strikes the goblin.</p><p></p><p>Other people believe that all three missiles would launch, and the one that hits the rock would dissipate harmlessly on contact, the one aimed at the orc would strike the Wall of Force and disappear, and the one that hits the goblin would deal damage.</p><p></p><p>It comes down to your interpretation of the phrase "has no effect". I see the effect as "a missile darts forth from your fingertip", others see the effect as "deals 1d4+1 points of damage".</p><p></p><p>The way that I read it, by the PHB, if you spread your missiles out across the mage and his four figments, only one missile would actually launch and hit the real mage. Thus, until the mage's next action, anyone observing would know which of the five identical figures was the ream one. On the mage's action, he can move into and through figments, once again disguising his real identity.</p><p></p><p>The FAQ entry, obviously, states that a Magic Missile will destroy a figment, which introduces a new theory not stated anywhere in the Core Rules anywhere - that illusions of creatures are considered creatures for targetting purposes.</p><p></p><p>So it's up to you whether you want the FAQ making up new rules, or merely clarifying ambiguous points in the existing rules.</p><p></p><p>-Hyp.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hypersmurf, post: 970734, member: 1656"] My personal opinion is that if you target a rock with a Magic Missile, then you lose the spell slot and nothing else happens. If you split your three missiles across a rock, a goblin, and an orc standing behind a Wall of Force, then the missile aimed at the rock fails to target (invalid target), the missile aimed at the orc fails to target (no Line of Effect to target), and so a single missile appears and unerringly strikes the goblin. Other people believe that all three missiles would launch, and the one that hits the rock would dissipate harmlessly on contact, the one aimed at the orc would strike the Wall of Force and disappear, and the one that hits the goblin would deal damage. It comes down to your interpretation of the phrase "has no effect". I see the effect as "a missile darts forth from your fingertip", others see the effect as "deals 1d4+1 points of damage". The way that I read it, by the PHB, if you spread your missiles out across the mage and his four figments, only one missile would actually launch and hit the real mage. Thus, until the mage's next action, anyone observing would know which of the five identical figures was the ream one. On the mage's action, he can move into and through figments, once again disguising his real identity. The FAQ entry, obviously, states that a Magic Missile will destroy a figment, which introduces a new theory not stated anywhere in the Core Rules anywhere - that illusions of creatures are considered creatures for targetting purposes. So it's up to you whether you want the FAQ making up new rules, or merely clarifying ambiguous points in the existing rules. -Hyp. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mirror Image
Top