Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ProfessorCirno" data-source="post: 4617898" data-attributes="member: 65637">I think you're making things far more divisive then they need to be.  The mention to 4e was done to defend 3e's problem addressing being done in other books; I haven't seen anything in this thread even vaguely related to attacks on 4e.  Oh, and "pro-3e" is not the same as "dislikes 4e to the point of attacking it."  Come on, now.As for PHB2, you can be a non-core book and still not be a splat book.  PHB2 is, by the definition of using content from the previous three core books, just as non-core as the 3.5 one.  The only difference is the sticker on it that says "CORE"Again, nothing in this thread is meant to rip on or attack 4e.  It's a simple thread detailing where problems 3.5 had were fixed.  There's no reason for this thread to devolve into bile and hate.</blockquote>