Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Oni" data-source="post: 4618904" data-attributes="member: 380">I'm not sure that I said anything to that effect.  All I meant was that, those are in fact very real issues with the system as written, and it was unfair to lable them as misconceptions, because changing the rules solved them.  I mean 3.5 can do practically anything if you change enough rules, M&M shows that.  But if you go back and play the game as written no amount of optional rules have made those problems go away.  I felt it was poor form to say, XYZ isn't a real problem in 3.5 because if you change the rules XYZ isn't a problem so you just didn't know what you were talking about.  That's how the OP came across to me, given the response I don't suppose I'm alone in that.  So I come back to my original question.  Is it fair to call them misconceptions?</blockquote>