Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mithral bucklers: A Bard's/Rogue's/Sorcerer's/Wizard's best friend...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jack Haggerty" data-source="post: 218413" data-attributes="member: 89"><p>That's great. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> Trust me as someone who's been here since Eric's board... I haven't yet seen the debate. Certainly not within the last year. The "shield" bonus that you uise is a much better idea. There's no need for "exceptions" and it fits perfectly... If fact, you could call a spell like <em>Shield</em> a shield bonus, instead of cover, and reduce a little of the potintial abuse.</p><p></p><p>Anyway... I don't really care whether or they do stack, I'm just trying to find a good reason for it, substantiated by something printed in the rulebooks. If the designers meant it to be that way, why didn't they make it a little more clear in the books?</p><p></p><p>It just gets a little frustrating to continually hear...</p><p></p><p>"Can I do this?"</p><p></p><p>"No."</p><p></p><p>"Why not? The rules don't say I can't..."</p><p></p><p>"Because <strong><em>They</em></strong> said you can't."</p><p></p><p>Laiyna - Bucklers give you a +1 to AC against everyone who attacks you... You no longer have to pick a single opponent. So any Special Ability you put on the buckler affects all enemies attack you. However, Invulnerability is a Special Ability you can only put on Armor, not Shields.</p><p></p><p>Dr. Zoom - I know it works that way, I was just trying to a point about the how silly the exception is... You do have a good point about incorporal attacks, though. I'll have to remember that.</p><p></p><p>At any rate... I asked my DM and the other players about it. They saw no reason why Mage Armor shouldn't stack with shields, with the Mage Armor essentially replacing normal armor. It looks like we'll probably use a house rule similar to IceBear's, with a warning for me not to take it to any extreme.</p><p></p><p>I don't think he was worried about it... Our next jaunt is into the Temple of Elemental Evil.</p><p></p><p>Now, back to mithral bucklers...</p><p></p><p>The reason I'm fond of the buckler, isn't so much that it'll give me better AC... Like Caliban and others have said, Bracers of armor can give a much larger AC bonus... But the fact that they can be enchanted with Special Abilities like Fortification, Spell Resistance, or Reflecting, which a wizard normally wouldn't be able to take advantage of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jack Haggerty, post: 218413, member: 89"] That's great. :rolleyes: Trust me as someone who's been here since Eric's board... I haven't yet seen the debate. Certainly not within the last year. The "shield" bonus that you uise is a much better idea. There's no need for "exceptions" and it fits perfectly... If fact, you could call a spell like [i]Shield[/i] a shield bonus, instead of cover, and reduce a little of the potintial abuse. Anyway... I don't really care whether or they do stack, I'm just trying to find a good reason for it, substantiated by something printed in the rulebooks. If the designers meant it to be that way, why didn't they make it a little more clear in the books? It just gets a little frustrating to continually hear... "Can I do this?" "No." "Why not? The rules don't say I can't..." "Because [b][i]They[/i][/b] said you can't." Laiyna - Bucklers give you a +1 to AC against everyone who attacks you... You no longer have to pick a single opponent. So any Special Ability you put on the buckler affects all enemies attack you. However, Invulnerability is a Special Ability you can only put on Armor, not Shields. Dr. Zoom - I know it works that way, I was just trying to a point about the how silly the exception is... You do have a good point about incorporal attacks, though. I'll have to remember that. At any rate... I asked my DM and the other players about it. They saw no reason why Mage Armor shouldn't stack with shields, with the Mage Armor essentially replacing normal armor. It looks like we'll probably use a house rule similar to IceBear's, with a warning for me not to take it to any extreme. I don't think he was worried about it... Our next jaunt is into the Temple of Elemental Evil. Now, back to mithral bucklers... The reason I'm fond of the buckler, isn't so much that it'll give me better AC... Like Caliban and others have said, Bracers of armor can give a much larger AC bonus... But the fact that they can be enchanted with Special Abilities like Fortification, Spell Resistance, or Reflecting, which a wizard normally wouldn't be able to take advantage of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Mithral bucklers: A Bard's/Rogue's/Sorcerer's/Wizard's best friend...
Top