Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mix multispecies traits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Veltharis ap Rylix" data-source="post: 9025191" data-attributes="member: 66357"><p>I think you're missing what I'm going for somewhat.</p><p></p><p>I don't mind some fiends serving evil gods, but I've always liked that there are also large portions of them that very explicitly don't.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Most devils serve the Lords of Nine, and through them Asmodeus - who wasn't necessarily portrayed as a god until 4e, a decision I happen to disagree with.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Most demons serve the various demon lords and demon princes - some of whom were also gods (Lolth, Orcus at some points) and others who weren't.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The yugoloths are famously anti-theistic - the Wasting Tower of Khin-Oin is said to be carved from the spine of the first godling that ever made a deal with them.</li> </ul><p>The celestial side of the equation has always felt far more tangled up - particularly in Celestia, where it's sometimes hard to tell whether the tome archons of the Celestial Hebdomad are in charge or some nebulous selection of good gods.</p><p></p><p>What I'm proposing is that celestials (archons, guardinals, asuras, whatever replaces the eladrin in Arborea) remain the counterpart of opposing alignment to fiends as a category, but that angels split off into into a third category all their own that isn't explicitly tied to alignment, so that <strong>any </strong>god can choose to create/call upon angelic servitors, not just the ones that are arbitrarily put in the "Good" bucket for whatever reason. Why shouldn't a CN goddess of love and passion (I think Aphrodite has been stated as such at times) have angelic servants?</p><p></p><p>Celestials and fiends can still occasionally choose to serve a deity, but they originate via the natural processes of the Outer Planes as an expression of alignment.</p><p>Angels can occasionally choose to abandon their divine patron or fall out of favor and be cast out, but they originate as servants created by a god as expressions of a divinely ordained cause.</p><p></p><p>And that filters down to ardlings, tieflings, and aasimar - ardlings are the descendants of celestials, tieflings are the descendants of fiends, aasimar are the descendants of the divine and their angelic servitors.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Unrelated, if you want to drop "Hades" as the name of the pure NE plane of the Great Wheel, I'd say go back to using the Gray Waste - Tartarus is analogous to Carceri.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Veltharis ap Rylix, post: 9025191, member: 66357"] I think you're missing what I'm going for somewhat. I don't mind some fiends serving evil gods, but I've always liked that there are also large portions of them that very explicitly don't. [LIST] [*]Most devils serve the Lords of Nine, and through them Asmodeus - who wasn't necessarily portrayed as a god until 4e, a decision I happen to disagree with. [*]Most demons serve the various demon lords and demon princes - some of whom were also gods (Lolth, Orcus at some points) and others who weren't. [*]The yugoloths are famously anti-theistic - the Wasting Tower of Khin-Oin is said to be carved from the spine of the first godling that ever made a deal with them. [/LIST] The celestial side of the equation has always felt far more tangled up - particularly in Celestia, where it's sometimes hard to tell whether the tome archons of the Celestial Hebdomad are in charge or some nebulous selection of good gods. What I'm proposing is that celestials (archons, guardinals, asuras, whatever replaces the eladrin in Arborea) remain the counterpart of opposing alignment to fiends as a category, but that angels split off into into a third category all their own that isn't explicitly tied to alignment, so that [B]any [/B]god can choose to create/call upon angelic servitors, not just the ones that are arbitrarily put in the "Good" bucket for whatever reason. Why shouldn't a CN goddess of love and passion (I think Aphrodite has been stated as such at times) have angelic servants? Celestials and fiends can still occasionally choose to serve a deity, but they originate via the natural processes of the Outer Planes as an expression of alignment. Angels can occasionally choose to abandon their divine patron or fall out of favor and be cast out, but they originate as servants created by a god as expressions of a divinely ordained cause. And that filters down to ardlings, tieflings, and aasimar - ardlings are the descendants of celestials, tieflings are the descendants of fiends, aasimar are the descendants of the divine and their angelic servitors. Unrelated, if you want to drop "Hades" as the name of the pure NE plane of the Great Wheel, I'd say go back to using the Gray Waste - Tartarus is analogous to Carceri. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Mix multispecies traits
Top