Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pogre" data-source="post: 8936186" data-attributes="member: 6588">1. Yep. Players were OK with it. I have a player pool of 12 players, but rarely have over six or seven at the table. I often have five. If I had four players only, like the rules are designed for, I think it would be more of a problem.2. Yep. Again, players were OK with it.3. Not really.4. I like it because I like having five or six players at the table - I would be much more careful with level differences if I ran a smaller table as I suggested above.If a player is in a tier below the party I usually bump them up to everyone else's current tier. This happens from time-to-time because I have players that are scattered throughout the country and only make it to the table a few times a year.I use traditional XP and divide it - that's the award for the top level PCs. For every level below the top level PCs a character is I add +10% to the XP award. People catch up from missing a session or two pretty quickly. My players have really like this system.</blockquote>