Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 4177074" data-attributes="member: 2067">The mere existence of templates contradicts the absoluteness of this statement.Depends on how soon someone from WotC wants to publish an adventure with an &quot;evil twin&quot; kind of plot, I guess.He's a Paladin, right? Role: Defender. Use the mark, unless one of your allies needs some hp, defense, or save boost, in which case, use that. Oddly, this will be the same strategy followed by the actual Paladin 90% of the time. Cue weird &quot;he can use my powers!&quot; moment.Though I guess our mythic Idiot DM could have some problems figuring out what the Paladin he's been running for 26 levels does?Okay, then, you agree with me. The 4e phane could have had the ability to make &quot;evil twin&quot; PC's. Why didn't it get that ability?It's all right, but seems more than a little pointlessly abstract. It's not like it's HARD to make the PC's run their own evil twin (since the numbers are the same, or, rather, the numbers are the same -2). I'd be fairly astonished if 4e was too dumb to handle that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 4177074, member: 2067"] The mere existence of templates contradicts the absoluteness of this statement. Depends on how soon someone from WotC wants to publish an adventure with an "evil twin" kind of plot, I guess. He's a Paladin, right? Role: Defender. Use the mark, unless one of your allies needs some hp, defense, or save boost, in which case, use that. Oddly, this will be the same strategy followed by the actual Paladin 90% of the time. Cue weird "he can use my powers!" moment. Though I guess our mythic Idiot DM could have some problems figuring out what the Paladin he's been running for 26 levels does? Okay, then, you agree with me. The 4e phane could have had the ability to make "evil twin" PC's. Why didn't it get that ability? It's all right, but seems more than a little pointlessly abstract. It's not like it's HARD to make the PC's run their own evil twin (since the numbers are the same, or, rather, the numbers are the same -2). I'd be fairly astonished if 4e was too dumb to handle that. [/QUOTE]

Verification